Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20
89 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
93 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 298g - 109 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed July 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the M (18MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the M (APS-C) and WG-20 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M was unveiled 18 months prior to the WG-20 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the M grades against the WG-20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M and Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are available at Canon M Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M over the Ricoh WG-20
| M | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Canon M
| WG-20 | M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | July 2012 | More modern by 18 months |
Common features in the Canon M and Ricoh WG-20
| M | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon M has external dimensions of 109mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the M compared to the WG-20.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M and WG-20 is 89 and 93 respectively.
Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M and WG-20.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon M will result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged M will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon M vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Canon EOS M | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon EOS M | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-07-23 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 5 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 31 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Clear View II TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/200 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (60, 50 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 298g (0.66 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 66 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 827 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $510 | $370 |