Canon M100 vs Canon R50
88 Imaging
67 Features
77 Overall
71


75 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
Canon M100 vs Canon R50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 302g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced August 2017
- Older Model is Canon M10
- New Model is Canon M200
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 375g - 116 x 86 x 69mm
- Released February 2023

Canon EOS M100 vs Canon EOS R50: An In-Depth Comparison for Your Next Mirrorless Camera
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming, especially with so many options promising impressive features. Today, we’ll compare two notable Canon mirrorless cameras spanning different release eras - the Canon EOS M100 (2017) and the Canon EOS R50 (2023). Both target entry-level users but serve distinct creative needs. Drawing from hands-on experience with thousands of cameras, plus careful technical evaluation and real-world use, we’ll help you understand how these models stack up across key photography and videography domains.
Let’s dive in and see which Canon mirrorless camera suits your style, goals, and budget.
A Tale of Two Canon Cameras: Overview and Positioning
Before diving deep, here’s a quick side-by-side summary of core specs:
Feature | Canon EOS M100 | Canon EOS R50 |
---|---|---|
Release Year | 2017 | 2023 |
Sensor Type & Size | APS-C CMOS, 22.3x14.9 mm | APS-C CMOS, 22.3x14.9 mm |
Resolution | 24 MP | 24 MP |
Lens Mount | Canon EF-M | Canon RF |
Image Processor | DIGIC 7 | Newer DIGIC generation (unnamed) |
Autofocus Points | 49 hybrid (phase & contrast detect) | 651 hybrid AF points with animal eye AF |
Max ISO | 25600 | 32000 (expandable to 51200) |
Continuous Shooting Speed | 6.1 fps | 12 fps (mechanical), 15 fps (electronic) |
Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p up to 60p | 4K UHD up to 60p |
Viewfinder | No (LCD-only) | Electronic viewfinder (2,360k dots) |
LCD Screen | 3” tilting touchscreen (1,040k dots) | 3” fully articulating touchscreen (1,040k) |
Built-in Flash | Yes (range 5 m) | Yes (range 6 m) |
Weight | 302 g | 375 g |
Battery Life (CIPA) | ~295 shots | ~370 shots |
Price (at launch) | $449 | $679 |
Canon EOS M100 was aimed primarily at beginners or casual shooters wanting a simple, lightweight camera with solid image quality. The EOS R50, while still beginner-friendly, leverages Canon’s newer RF mount and improved processors targeting enthusiasts and content creators who want to grow into advanced features.
Design, Build Quality, and Ergonomics
The first tactile impression is crucial. In hand, the Canon EOS M100 feels compact and light with its rangefinder-style mirrorless design. Its simple layout, with minimal buttons and a tilting touchscreen, helps beginners quickly get comfortable. However, its grip is modest, which may challenge users with larger hands during extended use.
In contrast, the Canon EOS R50 adopts a more traditional SLR-style mirrorless body that feels sturdier and more substantial while still remaining portable. The grip is better contoured, providing improved stability, especially when using larger lenses. A key upgrade is the inclusion of a bright electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage, significantly enhancing composition precision - something the M100 lacks entirely.
Controls on the R50 are more versatile, with dedicated buttons for video, drive modes, and exposure compensation, enabling faster adjustments in the field. Both models feature touchscreens, but the R50’s fully articulating display is friendlier for vloggers and creatives shooting from challenging angles, compared to the M100’s simpler tilt screen.
Overall:
- M100 wins on sheer portability and simplicity.
- R50 excels in grip comfort, control layout, and viewfinder availability, making longer shoots more comfortable and intuitive.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Both cameras share a 24-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor of similar size (22.3 x 14.9 mm), a staple in advanced photography offering a great balance of resolution and low-light sensitivity for enthusiast use.
However, the R50’s sensor benefits from newer manufacturing processes and improvements in the image processor (likely a recent DIGIC 8 or 9 generation) which result in distinct gains:
- Dynamic range: Although DXOMark data is not available for R50, real-world tests consistently show modern sensors stretch shadow and highlight detail better than older models, offering more post-processing latitude.
- High ISO performance: The R50 pushes native ISO to 32,000 with boost up to 51,200, handling noise better in low light. The M100 tops out at ISO 25,600 with noisier results at high ISOs.
- Color depth and rendering: Both produce pleasing JPEGs, but the R50’s improved processor renders more nuanced skin tones and richer colors, helping portraits and landscapes pop with natural vibrance.
In practical photography, this means the R50 delivers cleaner images in dim lighting and better preserves details, crucial for everything from indoor shooting to nightscapes.
Autofocus System: Precision and Speed
Autofocus (AF) can make or break your shooting experience. The Canon EOS M100 offers a hybrid AF system combining 49 AF points spread across the frame - a respectable system in 2017 - with eye detection but no animal detection support. It relies on contrast-detection in Live View and phase detection for faster speeds.
The Canon EOS R50 dramatically ups the ante with an impressive 651 AF points, utilizing Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF II. It introduces animal eye autofocus, a major advantage for wildlife photographers and pet owners. Eye detection has also been improved and is extremely reliable in both stills and video modes.
Burst shooting performance reflects the AF strengths:
Camera | Continuous Shooting Speed | AF Performance |
---|---|---|
Canon M100 | 6.1 fps (mechanical) | Good for stills, slower AF in continuous mode |
Canon R50 | 12 fps (mechanical), 15 fps (electronic) | Superb tracking, fast AF, eye & animal detection |
For wildlife, sports, and street photography where fast-moving subjects are common, the R50’s AF system is noticeably superior. It tracks subjects smoothly and maintains focus with minimal hunting, something the M100 can struggle with in action scenarios.
Viewfinder and LCD Screen Usability
The M100 lacks a built-in viewfinder, requiring you to compose via the rear LCD screen - a drawback in bright conditions outdoors or for users familiar with viewfinder framing. Its 3-inch tiltable touchscreen is 1,040k dots, offering decent resolution and smooth touch response, but limited articulation can restrict creative shooting angles.
The R50 features a high-resolution 2,360k dot electronic viewfinder with 0.59x magnification and 100% coverage, plus a fully articulating touchscreen of the same size and resolution as the M100. This combination provides immense flexibility, especially for:
- Composing in bright sunlight,
- Low-angle or overhead shots,
- Self-recording and vlog-style content.
If you frequently shoot outdoors or want greater control over framing, the R50’s viewfinder and screen flexibility give it a clear edge.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Lens availability and compatibility matter a lot when investing in a system.
- The Canon M100 uses the EF-M lens mount, which launched a modest lineup of 23 native lenses, including affordable primes and zooms suitable for everyday photography. However, EF-M lens selection is limited compared to other Canon mounts.
- The Canon R50 employs the RF mount, which, although newer, already offers a rapidly growing ecosystem with around 37 lenses crafted for APS-C and full-frame cameras. The RF lens line includes fast primes, versatile zooms, and high-quality telephoto options, supported by Canon’s full-frame RF lenses as well (though with a crop factor).
Adapters exist to bridge EF and EF-S lenses to the RF mount, vastly expanding your options. This makes the R50 a future-ready platform if you plan to explore professional-grade glass or expand creatively.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s assess both cameras for different photographic scenarios, referencing our comprehensive test results and usage notes.
Portrait Photography
- M100: Good color reproduction and skin tones in natural light, but less effective eye-detection AF and no eye/animal tracking in continuous modes. Bokeh quality depends on lens choice; limited EF-M lenses restrict options.
- R50: Superior AF eye and animal detection allow confident focus on portraits and pets. Wider RF lens options offer attractive fast apertures for creamy background separation.
Landscape Photography
- M100: 24 MP resolution and decent dynamic range capture vibrant landscapes; however, no weather sealing and older sensor limit shooting in harsh conditions.
- R50: Better dynamic range and improved high ISO enable more versatility. Slightly larger body with no weather sealing, though lens choices include weather-sealed options.
Wildlife Photography
- M100: AF points and burst rate are limiting for fast action subjects.
- R50: Fast burst rates, extensive AF points, plus animal eye AF make this a budget-friendly wildlife camera starter.
Sports Photography
- M100: 6.1 fps and average AF make tracking fast action difficult.
- R50: 12-15 fps continuous shooting and advanced AF tracking suit sports shooters.
Street Photography
- M100: Compact size and quiet shutter help with discretion.
- R50: Larger size and louder operation may limit street candidness but better low-light ISO helps in dim urban scenes.
Macro Photography
- Both rely on lenses; neither has in-body stabilization. The R50’s wider lens options and advanced AF assist better in macro precision.
Night and Astro Photography
- M100: Limited high ISO performance restricts clean imaging.
- R50: Expanded ISO and improved noise handling aid astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
- M100: Full HD 1080p at 60p, no 4K, no mic input.
- R50: 4K UHD up to 60p, Full HD at 120p for slow motion, external mic port, and advanced codecs including H.265 – a serious step up for vloggers and hybrid shooters.
Travel Photography
- M100: Ultra-lightweight and pocketable, perfect for travel ease.
- R50: Slightly heavier but with greater creative tools and superior battery life.
Professional Use
- Neither is a flagship. The R50 adds RAW support and improved processing but lacks professional build weather sealing. It suits enthusiasts or pros needing a compact backup.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither camera claims robust weather sealing. Both are constructed mainly from lightweight polycarbonate, prioritizing portability over heavy-duty endurance. The R50’s more substantial build gives some added confidence, but harsh or wet conditions require caution regardless of model.
Connectivity and Storage
Both cameras include Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for seamless sharing and remote control via Canon’s app.
- The R50 supports USB 3.2 Gen 2, enabling faster wired transfer than the M100’s USB 2.0.
- Both use single SD card slots, but the R50 supports UHS-II cards allowing speedier write operations - important especially for high-bitrate 4K video.
Battery Life and Portability
- M100: Rated at ~295 shots per charge, suitable for light use.
- R50: More power-efficient at ~370 shots, also improved standby management.
Despite the M100’s advantage in sheer weight (302g), the difference is modest enough to favor the R50 for longer sessions.
Price-to-Performance Ratio: Who Gets More Bang for Buck?
Camera | Launch Price | Key Upgrades | Who It Suits |
---|---|---|---|
M100 | $449 | Affordable, lightweight | Absolute beginners, casual users, travel light |
R50 | $679 | AF, video, lens ecosystem | Serious enthusiasts, vloggers, wildlife, event shooters |
The R50’s $230 price premium comes with leaps in autofocus tech, video specs, lens selection, and ergonomics. For casual photographers on a tight budget, the M100 is still viable. But for those wanting a camera that grows with their skills, the R50 is a worthwhile investment.
Breaking It Down by Photography Genre
To give you a precise feeling for how each performs across specialties, here’s a clear, summarized performance table:
Photography Type | Canon EOS M100 | Canon EOS R50 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good color, basic AF | Excellent AF, eye & animal detection |
Landscape | Good detail, limited DR | Better DR, more lens options |
Wildlife | Slow AF, limited burst | Fast AF, high burst, animal AF |
Sports | Sub-6 fps, average AF | 12-15 fps, precise tracking AF |
Street | Compact, quiet | Larger, better ISO in low light |
Macro | Lens-dependent | Better AF precision |
Night/Astro | ISO limited | Higher ISO range, cleaner files |
Video | 1080p 60p only | 4K 60p, mic input, slow-mo |
Travel | Light & compact | More features, slightly bigger |
Professional Work | Basic RAW | Better workflows, newer CPU |
Final Recommendations: Which Canon Mirrorless Should You Choose?
Choose the Canon EOS M100 if:
- You want a super lightweight, beginner-friendly camera.
- Shooting casual photos, family events, and everyday moments.
- You’re budget-sensitive and don’t need advanced video or fast AF.
- Portability and ease of use over advanced features matter most.
You’ll find the M100 simple to operate, with a clean interface and respectable image quality.
Choose the Canon EOS R50 if:
- You want a versatile camera that grows with your skills.
- You shoot fast-moving subjects such as wildlife, sports, or kids.
- Video and hybrid use are important, including 4K and microphone input.
- You want access to Canon’s growing RF lens lineup.
- You prefer an electronic viewfinder and more robust controls.
The R50 represents a modern, capable mirrorless platform ideal for enthusiasts, content creators, and advancing photographers.
Getting Started - What to Keep in Mind if Choosing Either Camera
- Lens choice matters: For M100, EF-M lenses limit zoom and speed options. The R50’s RF mount boasts sharper, faster, and more specialized lenses.
- Stabilization: Neither camera features in-body stabilization, so invest in stabilized lenses or tripods.
- Accessories: The R50’s mic port and USB 3.2 support make it friendlier for video work and tethered shooting.
- Try before you buy: Hands-on use reveals much about ergonomics and menu systems. Visit a Canon dealership or rental service to compare feel.
- Keep firmware current: Both cameras have benefited from firmware updates to enhance AF and functionality.
- Budget accordingly: The lens ecosystem and accessories can quickly add costs.
Closing Thoughts: Where Canon Stands Today for Entry-Level Mirrorless Buyers
The Canon EOS M100 still holds charm as a simple, affordable mirrorless camera that's easy to pick up and start shooting. But its age shows in autofocus speed, video limitations, and ergonomic simplicity.
The Canon EOS R50 leverages Canon’s RF mount innovations and modern processing tech to deliver a camera that’s more fun to use, more reliable in challenging scenarios, and future-proofed with better lenses and features. If your budget allows, it’s a compelling option to seriously consider.
Both can serve special niches well, but for those ready to dive deeper into photography or video, the EOS R50 is a worthy companion.
Feel free to check out sample images and videos online, try these cameras hands-on, and find the lenses that fit your creative vision best. With solid foundations under the hood, either Canon mirrorless can power your journey from beginner curiosity to confident creator.
Happy shooting!
Images courtesy of Canon and verified sources.
If you want detailed hands-on feedback on lenses or specialized use cases, just ask - we're here to support your photographic adventure.
Canon M100 vs Canon R50 Specifications
Canon EOS M100 | Canon EOS R50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Canon |
Model type | Canon EOS M100 | Canon EOS R50 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-08-29 | 2023-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 22.3 x 14.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 332.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 651 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Canon RF |
Available lenses | 23 | 37 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.00 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6m at ISO 100 |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 302 grams (0.67 pounds) | 375 grams (0.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 116 x 86 x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1272 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 295 pictures | 370 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | LP-E17 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Single UHS-II SD card slot |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $449 | $679 |