Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620
58 Imaging
48 Features
76 Overall
59
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Launched February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the E-620 (12MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-5 was brought out 20 months after the E-620 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-5 grades vs the E-620 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 & Olympus E-620. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Olympus E-620
E-5 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 20 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Olympus E-5
E-620 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Olympus E-620
E-5 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers physical dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) while the Olympus E-620 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-5 vs the E-620.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and E-620 is 58 and 71 respectively.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The image here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and E-620.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos however you should factor the age of the cameras into account. The more recent E-5 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-5 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Olympus E-620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Olympus E-620 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-02-03 | 2009-07-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 7 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 45 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | HyperCrystal LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.48x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800 gr (1.76 pounds) | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) |
Dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 photographs | 500 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $799 |