Clicky

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320

Portability
88
Imaging
67
Features
77
Overall
71
Canon EOS M100 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon M100
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 302g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Succeeded the Canon M10
  • Later Model is Canon M200
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Canon M100 and Kodak M320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Kodak. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the M100 (24MP) and M320 (9MP) and the M100 (APS-C) and M320 (1/2.5") provide different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M100 was manufactured 8 years later than the M320 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon M100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the M100 grades versus the M320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Canon M100 over the Kodak M320

 M100 M320 
ReleasedAugust 2017January 2009More recent by 106 months
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon M100

 M320 M100 

Common features in the Canon M100 and Kodak M320

 M100 M320 

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon M100 has outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 302 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Canon M100 and Kodak M320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the M100 versus the M320.

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M100 and M320 is 88 and 95 respectively.

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M100 and M320.

Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M100 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Canon M100 will offer greater detail due to its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent M100 provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon M100
Portrait photography with Kodak M320
73
focusing manually
MP count good (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW files
no external flash support
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M100
Street photography with Kodak M320
82
screen tilts up and down
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than others (155 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon M100 Sports photography advice
Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
66
MP count good (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect auto focus
no image stabilization
not so great battery life (295 CIPA)
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon M100 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
81
supports bluetooth
comes with touch to focus
MP count good (24MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery life (295 shots)
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon M100 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
74
focusing manually
switch lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
nice screen size (3")
MP count good (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
not so great battery life (295 per charge)
22
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M100 Vlogging info
Kodak M320 Vlogging info
75
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
features face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
no image stabilization
missing external microphone support
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
heavier than others (155 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M100 and Kodak M320
 Canon EOS M100Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Kodak
Model type Canon EOS M100 Kodak EasyShare M320
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2017-08-29 2009-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 7 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 49 25
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 23 -
Crop factor 1.6 6.3
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1400 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.1 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 302g (0.67 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 79 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1272 not tested
Other
Battery life 295 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $449 $39