Canon M100 vs Kodak M320
88 Imaging
67 Features
77 Overall
71


95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 302g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Succeeded the Canon M10
- Later Model is Canon M200
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon M100 and Kodak M320, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Canon and Kodak. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the M100 (24MP) and M320 (9MP) and the M100 (APS-C) and M320 (1/2.5") provide different sensor measurements.

The M100 was manufactured 8 years later than the M320 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Canon M100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the M100 grades versus the M320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M100 and Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M100 Gallery and Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M100 over the Kodak M320
M100 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 106 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon M100
M320 | M100 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M100 and Kodak M320
M100 | M320 |
---|
Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon M100 has outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 302 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon M100 and Kodak M320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the M100 versus the M320.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M100 and M320 is 88 and 95 respectively.

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M100 and M320.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M100 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Canon M100 will offer greater detail due to its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent M100 provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M100 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
Canon EOS M100 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Kodak |
Model type | Canon EOS M100 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2017-08-29 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3472 x 2604 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 302g (0.67 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1272 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 295 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $449 | $39 |