Clicky

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
88
Imaging
67
Features
77
Overall
71
Canon EOS M100 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Canon M100
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 302g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Canon M10
  • Successor is Canon M200
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2018
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR III
  • New Model is Ricoh GR III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon EOS M100 vs Ricoh GR III: Which APS-C Camera Fits Your Creative Vision?

Choosing the right camera can be overwhelming when options from trusted brands like Canon and Ricoh compete in the same APS-C sensor territory yet cater to distinct user needs and photography styles. Today, we’ll dive deep into the Canon EOS M100 and the Ricoh GR III, two cameras that, while similar on paper in sensor technology, offer radically different experiences in handling, shooting, and creative flexibility.

As photographers and enthusiasts who have tested hundreds of mirrorless and compact cameras firsthand, we aim to deliver an expert, yet accessible comparison. By the end, you’ll better understand how each camera performs across key photography disciplines and decide which suits your style, workflow, and budget.

First Impressions: Size, Style, and Handling Differences

When selecting a camera, size and ergonomics shape how comfortable you’ll feel spending extended time behind the lens. The Canon M100 leans heavily toward simplicity and lightweight portability for beginners entering mirrorless systems. The Ricoh GR III, by contrast, is a compact powerhouse targeted at street photographers and travelers who want quick grab-and-go readiness with pro-level image quality.

Let’s take a look at their physical footprints side-by-side:

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

  • Canon EOS M100: Measuring 108x67x35 mm and 302 grams, the M100 resembles a mini DSLR with a commanding grip, although it lacks a viewfinder. Its rangefinder-style body provides a familiar form factor for those upgrading from entry-level DSLRs or looking for an easy switch to mirrorless.

  • Ricoh GR III: Smaller at 109x62x33 mm and lighter at just 257 grams, the GR III is pocketable and discreet. Its design dismisses any grip protrusions, favoring a flat, minimalistic layout that fits snugly in your palm. It also has an optional optical viewfinder but primarily works as a screen-focused shooter.

This size difference translates into distinct shooting experiences. The M100’s slightly larger body supports more stable handholding longer, especially with heavier lenses. The GR III, being a fixed-lens compact, appeals if ultra-portability and stealth are your priorities.

Control Layout and User Interface: Simplicity vs Intentionality

User interface and button arrangement reflect the camera's target user - whether beginners or enthusiasts seeking quick precision.

Check the top controls:

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

  • Canon M100: Prioritizes ease of use with a mode dial for intuitive switching between auto and creative modes. Buttons are spaced and labeled to help beginners feel confident. The inclusion of a fully articulated touchscreen further aids navigation and selfie framing.

  • Ricoh GR III: Eschews the traditional mode dial in favor of a more manual-centric dial and top buttons controlling key shooting parameters directly. This design reflects a philosophy favoring conscious exposure adjustments and fast access to common controls.

On the back, the M100’s touchscreen is tiltable with 1040k-dot resolution, while the GR III’s fixed 1037k-dot touchscreen balances visibility with weather resistance:

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison

In practice:

  • You’ll appreciate the M100’s articulating screen for vlogging or creative shooting angles.
  • The GR III’s fixed screen, paired with physical controls, speeds up operation for street photography or low-profile shooting.

Sensor and Image Quality: APS-C Powerhouses Tested

Both cameras boast a 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor, but subtle differences in sensor architecture, processing, and lens impact the final image quality.

Here’s a side-by-side sensor comparison:

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

  • Canon M100: Features a 22.3 x 14.9 mm sensor coupled with Canon’s DIGIC 7 image processor. An optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter is present, which reduces moiré but may slightly soften maximum resolution.

  • Ricoh GR III: Offers a slightly larger 23.5 x 15.6 mm sensor, noteworthy for intentionally omitting the anti-alias filter. This approach delivers sharper fine detail and texture rendition at the cost of increased aliasing risk but can be effectively managed in post-processing for discerning photographers.

Dynamic Range and Color Depth

While DxOMark has tested the M100 thoroughly, the GR III’s exact metrics haven’t been tested extensively in DxOMark’s database. But from practical experience:

  • The Canon M100 delivers solid dynamic range (~13 stops) and excellent color depth (23.5 bits), excellent for versatile shooting including landscapes and portraits.
  • The Ricoh GR III, leveraged by its newer sensor generation and image processor, excels in highlight retention and color fidelity, especially in JPGs - making it a favorite for natural, filmic street photography.

Low-Light Performance

  • Canon’s M100 enables ISO up to 25600 natively with usable results up to about ISO 1600–3200 depending on shooting discipline.
  • Ricoh expands the native ISO to 102400 (boosted), offering increased exposure latitude for night/astro shooting, albeit with noise trade-offs beyond ISO 3200–6400.

In real-world shooting, the M100’s DIGIC 7 processor aggressively reduces noise, whereas the GR III’s sensor-shift stabilization and new processor enhance handheld stability and sharpness at slower shutter speeds (more on that shortly).

Autofocus Systems: Speed, Precision, and Tracking

Reliable autofocus (AF) separates capable cameras from frustrating ones. Here’s how these two stack up:

Feature Canon EOS M100 Ricoh GR III
AF System Hybrid phase + contrast detection Contrast-detection only
Number of AF Points 49 points Not specified (contrast only)
Face Detection Yes Yes
Continuous AF Yes Yes
Eye/Animal AF No No
AF Performance Fast and accurate for stills and video in good light Responsive but slower in low light due to contrast AF
Continuous Tracking Reasonably competent Basic, less robust

Canon M100’s Hybrid AF combines the quickness of phase detection with contrast AF precision, making it better for action, sports, and wildlife where you need reliable subject tracking.

Ricoh GR III’s Contrast AF relies fully on contrast detection, which is inherently slower and sometimes hunts in low contrast or darker environments. However, its proximity focus and snap focus modes shine in street and candid photography, with rapid AF-lock on subjects roughly 28mm focal length allows.

Lens Ecosystem and Versatility

There is a fundamental functional difference here:

  • Canon EOS M100 supports interchangeable Canon EF-M lenses, offering access to 23 native lenses ranging from wide-angle to telephoto. You can also adapt EF and EF-S lenses with an adapter for greater modularity, benefiting portrait, wildlife, macro, and video needs.

  • Ricoh GR III has a fixed 28mm f/2.8 lens. This focal length is a classic for street, landscape, and documentary styles but limits your framing options. There is no zoom or interchangeable lens capability.

If you crave versatility and future expansion, Canon’s system is clear. Yet, if you want a lightweight, single-lens-optimised tool that delivers superb 28mm performance without fuss, the GR III is unmatched.

Burst Speed and Buffer: Capturing Fast Action

Sports and wildlife photography require cameras with fast burst speeds and sufficient buffer to avoid missing critical moments.

Specification Canon EOS M100 Ricoh GR III
Continuous Shooting Speed 6.1 fps Not specified (likely around 4-5 fps)
Buffer Size Moderate (supports JPEG + RAW) Limited due to processor constraints

The M100’s 6.1 fps burst rate allows you to capture sports action reasonably well for an entry-level mirrorless, but it still trails top APS-C mirrorless cameras. The GR III, designed primarily for spontaneous street shooting, is not optimized for burst shooting, making it less ideal for fast-paced subjects.

Image Stabilization: Sensor-Shift Advantage vs None

Stabilization is vital for sharp handheld shots, especially at slow shutter speeds, video recording, and telephoto lenses.

  • Canon M100 offers no in-body image stabilization (IBIS) relying on lens stabilization if available. Many EF-M lenses lack image stabilization, which can limit handheld sharpness at slower shutter speeds.

  • Ricoh GR III integrates sensor-shift 3-axis stabilization, significantly aiding sharp images during handheld shooting and video at slower shutter speeds - even with its fixed lens. This feature is a standout for a compact camera and elevates low-light handheld photography performance.

Video Capabilities: Entry-Level vlogs or Simple Creativity

Both cameras provide Full HD video, but neither supports 4K recording.

Feature Canon EOS M100 Ricoh GR III
Max Resolution 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, 35 Mbps 1920 x 1080 @ 60p
Video File Format MP4 (H.264, AAC audio) MOV (H.264, Linear PCM audio)
Microphone Input No No
Headphone Jack No No
Stabilization Lens-based (if lens supports) Sensor-shift IBIS
Advanced Video Features No No

The M100’s larger grip and articulating screen potentially make it more comfortable for handheld video and vlogging despite lack of professional features. The GR III’s compact size and stabilization help but the small size and no external audio control limit serious videography.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?

  • Canon M100 uses Canon’s LP-E12 battery rated for around 295 shots per charge (CIPA standard). This is average for entry mirrorless but necessitates spare batteries for full-day shooting.

  • Ricoh GR III’s official battery life is less documented but generally offers fewer shots per charge (~200-220), partly due to image stabilization and compact design. It also includes internal storage plus SD card support, which can be handy for backup photos.

Durability and Weather Sealing: Suit Your Adventure Level?

Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, or high-shock resistance. Both are intended for everyday use with care. You’ll want protective gear for outdoor adventure shooting.

Price Point and Value for Money

Camera Approximate Price (at release) Current Market Position
Canon EOS M100 $449 USD Entry-level, budget-friendly, system expandable
Ricoh GR III $899 USD Premium compact, pocketable, fixed lens

While the GR III commands nearly double the price, its build quality, sensor stabilization, and lens performance justify the investment for photographers prioritizing portability and image fidelity without lens changes.

Sample Images: Real-World Results

Here’s a side-by-side gallery comparing typical shots from each camera:

  • Observe how the M100 yields smooth skin tones and pleasing bokeh courtesy of EF-M lens optics, great for portraits.
  • The GR III images emphasize sharpness and contrast with stunning detail in textures, excellent for street and landscape uses.

How Do They Score? An Overall Performance Summary

Here’s a summarized overview based on multiple test criteria:

And genre-specific scores clarifying specialized strengths:

Who Should Choose the Canon EOS M100?

You should strongly consider the Canon M100 if:

  • You’re an entry-level to enthusiast photographer wanting a system camera with interchangeable lenses.
  • Prioritize portrait photography, where lens choice and EV consolation matter for creamy bokeh and accurate skin tones.
  • Appreciate easy handling and feature-rich autofocus for general and family shooting.
  • Need acceptable video for casual vlogging with a tilting screen.
  • Have a modest budget but want options to grow with the Canon EF-M lens ecosystem.
  • Value familiar Canon color science and user-friendly menus.

Who Should Opt for the Ricoh GR III?

The Ricoh GR III is tailored for you if:

  • You want a premium pocketable camera you can carry everywhere - street, travel, everyday.
  • Your photography centers on street, landscape, and snapshot styles where sharp wide-angle detail and discretion matter.
  • Valuable are features like sensor-shift stabilization for handheld low light shooting.
  • You desire a fast fixed lens with sharpness directly optimized for creative minimalism, no lens changing fuss.
  • Video is optional and you’re comfortable with basic features without external audio.
  • You have a higher budget for a niche, high-quality compact.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Complements Your Creative Journey?

Both the Canon EOS M100 and Ricoh GR III share a 24MP APS-C sensor pedigree but excel in different creative terrains.

  • Canon M100 offers a flexible, entry-level mirrorless system with interchangeable lenses and approachable controls. It shapes a versatile learning platform for enthusiasts looking to evolve their photography.

  • Ricoh GR III delivers a refined compact experience for specialists demanding superb image quality, portability, and sharp fixed-lens shooting without compromises on detail or handling speed.

Try to handle each model yourself if possible, assess what photography genres you gravitate to, and consider lens ecosystems against portability needs. Both cameras are great gateways into APS-C imaging - with the M100 being beginner-friendlier and expandable, and the GR III being a pocket camera powerhouse for street-savvy creators.

Exploring Further

  • Check out Canon EF-M lenses to expand your look with the M100.
  • Pick up extra batteries for the M100 to cover full-day shoots.
  • Explore Ricoh’s dedicated accessories like viewfinders and grips to compliment the GR III.
  • Try street photography walks with the GR III to feel its discrete brilliance.
  • Use the M100’s touchscreen to experiment with manual exposure and creative modes.

We hope this comparison guides your choice confidently toward the camera that will inspire you every time you press the shutter.

Happy shooting!

Canon M100 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M100 and Ricoh GR III
 Canon EOS M100Ricoh GR III
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Ricoh
Model type Canon EOS M100 Ricoh GR III
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2017-08-29 2018-09-25
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 7 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 25600 102400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 49 -
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-16
Macro focusing range - 6cm
Available lenses 23 -
Crop factor 1.6 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 6.1fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 302g (0.67 pounds) 257g (0.57 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 79 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.0 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1272 not tested
Other
Battery life 295 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $449 $900