Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7eb5/d7eb58ad0dd4eba3b999b824f84ce7ac6eb35d7c" alt="Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front"
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the FE-5010 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FE-5010 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-520 was launched 4 months prior to the FE-5010 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5010 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-520 matches up versus the FE-5010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Olympus FE-5010. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus FE-5010
E-520 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Olympus E-520
FE-5010 | E-520 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus FE-5010
E-520 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2008 | ![]() | January 2009 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5010 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-520 vs the FE-5010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4dac/d4dacc0e0114944af59a352b9a7acba7e659bbc9" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and FE-5010 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8954/e8954a06c31ab5766e8138ca1a6319fb5171b33f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The picture underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FE-5010.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus FE-5010 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/000d0/000d06c0a48b2ded3429c1d8989b4916df6f08bf" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17184/1718483ff13879c2f46e477ac9c858d707d95e7c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus FE-5010 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $400 | $130 |