Canon M200 vs Canon M5
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
77 Imaging
67 Features
84 Overall
73
Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Released September 2019
- Superseded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 427g - 116 x 89 x 61mm
- Launched September 2016
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon M200 and Canon M5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both produced by Canon. The image resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the M5 (24MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was brought out 3 years later than the M5 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Canon M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M200 matches up against the M5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Canon EOS M5. The entire galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Canon M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Canon M5
| M200 | M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2019 |  | September 2016 | More recent by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Canon M5 over the Canon M200
| M5 | M200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 1040k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Canon M5
| M200 | M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Canon M200 enjoys external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Canon M5 has specifications of 116mm x 89mm x 61mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 and Canon M5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M200 vs the M5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and M5 is 88 and 77 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and M5.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs however you should consider the age of the products into consideration. The more modern M200 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon M200 vs Canon M5 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Canon EOS M5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Canon |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Canon EOS M5 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2019-09-25 | 2016-09-15 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | Digic 7 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 22.3 x 14.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 332.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Canon EF-M |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 23 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3.2" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/200s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 427g (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 116 x 89 x 61mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 77 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1262 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 295 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $549 | $680 |
