Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Canon M200 and Casio EX-H15, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and EX-H15 (14MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and EX-H15 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe M200 was manufactured 9 years later than the EX-H15 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Casio EX-H15 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the M200 grades vs the EX-H15 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 & Casio Exilim EX-H15. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Casio EX-H15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Casio EX-H15
| M200 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 119 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+579k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Canon M200
| EX-H15 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Casio EX-H15
| M200 | EX-H15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and size. The Canon M200 has external measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-H15 has specifications of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 and Casio EX-H15 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M200 against the EX-H15.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and EX-H15 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The visual underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and EX-H15.
All in all, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M200 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Canon M200 will provide greater detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger M200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-H15 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Casio |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim EX-H15 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.7 |
| Number of lenses | 23 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 lbs) | 161g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NP-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $549 | $300 |