Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90
88 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Older Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
Photography Glossary Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Canon M200 and Casio EX-Z90, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Casio. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and EX-Z90 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and EX-Z90 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M200 was introduced 10 years after the EX-Z90 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Casio EX-Z90 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the M200 grades against the EX-Z90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 and Casio Exilim EX-Z90. The whole galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery and Casio EX-Z90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Casio EX-Z90
| M200 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2019 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 123 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Canon M200
| EX-Z90 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Casio EX-Z90
| M200 | EX-Z90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Canon M200 offers physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Casio EX-Z90 has sizing of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Canon M200 and Casio EX-Z90 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M200 versus the EX-Z90.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and EX-Z90 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and EX-Z90.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M200 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon M200 will produce extra detail using its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer M200 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Casio EX-Z90 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2009-08-18 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | Digic 4 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
| Available lenses | 23 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | NP-60 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $549 | $150 |