Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX
88 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Canon M200 and Casio TRYX, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and TRYX (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and TRYX (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was launched 8 years later than the TRYX and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the M200 matches up vs the TRYX for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 and Casio Exilim TRYX. The complete galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery and Casio TRYX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Casio TRYX
| M200 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 | January 2011 | More recent by 107 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Crisper screen (+579k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Canon M200
| TRYX | M200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Casio TRYX
| M200 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Casio TRYX has proportions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Canon M200 and Casio TRYX in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the M200 versus the TRYX.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and TRYX is 88 and 99 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and TRYX.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M200 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher M200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim TRYX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Casio |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Casio Exilim TRYX |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 21mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 8cm |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $549 | $689 |