Clicky

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX

Portability
88
Imaging
68
Features
80
Overall
72
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Casio Exilim TRYX front
Portability
99
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Revealed September 2019
  • Earlier Model is Canon M100
Casio TRYX
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21mm (F2.8) lens
  • n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Canon M200 and Casio TRYX, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Canon and Casio. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and TRYX (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and TRYX (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M200 was launched 8 years later than the TRYX and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Casio TRYX being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the M200 matches up vs the TRYX for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Casio TRYX

 M200 TRYX 
IntroducedSeptember 2019January 2011More recent by 107 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen resolution1040k461kCrisper screen (+579k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Canon M200

 TRYX M200 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen

Common features in the Canon M200 and Casio TRYX

 M200 TRYX 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 has got physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Casio TRYX has proportions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Canon M200 and Casio TRYX in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the M200 versus the TRYX.

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and TRYX is 88 and 99 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out specs. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and TRYX.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M200 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher M200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography info
Casio TRYX Portrait photography info
74
focusing manually
good resolution (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW files
no external flash support
21
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography info
Casio TRYX Street photography info
82
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch focus
good high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
58
fully articulated screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography information
Casio TRYX Sports photography information
74
good resolution (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect auto focus
no image stabilization
17
focal length is fixed (21mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography information
Casio TRYX Travel photography information
88
has bluetooth
comes with touch focus
good resolution (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
56
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 as a Landscape photography camera
Casio TRYX as a Landscape photography camera
79
focusing manually
switch lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
good resolution (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
28
nice screen size (3 inch)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (21mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon M200
Vlogging with Casio TRYX
75
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
features face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
no image stabilization
lack of external mic jack
62
screen is selfie friendly
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Canon M200 vs Casio TRYX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Casio TRYX
 Canon EOS M200Casio Exilim TRYX
General Information
Make Canon Casio
Model type Canon EOS M200 Casio Exilim TRYX
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2019-09-25 2011-01-05
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 8 Exilim Engine HS
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 21mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing range - 8cm
Amount of lenses 23 -
Crop factor 1.6 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 461 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - Super Clear TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 1/8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 6.1 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 lbs) -
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID LP-E12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $549 $689