Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73


54 Imaging
40 Features
71 Overall
52
Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Replaced the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 808g - 135 x 101 x 146mm
- Released January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm HS35EXR

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and FujiFilm. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and Fujifilm HS50 EXR (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and Fujifilm HS50 EXR (1/2") have totally different sensor measurements.

The M200 was unveiled 6 years after the Fujifilm HS50 EXR which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Fujifilm HS50 EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M200 grades against the Fujifilm HS50 EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 and Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR. The full galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery and Fujifilm HS50 EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Fujifilm HS50 EXR
M200 | Fujifilm HS50 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2019 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 82 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS50 EXR over the Canon M200
Fujifilm HS50 EXR | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Fujifilm HS50 EXR
M200 | Fujifilm HS50 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm HS50 EXR has measurements of 135mm x 101mm x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") and a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Check out the Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the M200 versus the Fujifilm HS50 EXR.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and Fujifilm HS50 EXR is 88 and 54 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The picture here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and Fujifilm HS50 EXR.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M200 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon M200 will provide more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern M200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 vs Fujifilm HS50 EXR Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Fujifilm FinePix HS50 EXR |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 8 | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-1000mm (41.7x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 0cm |
Number of lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 920 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 lb) | 808g (1.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 135 x 101 x 146mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photos | 500 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $549 | $500 |