Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Hasselblad. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M200 was announced 4 months after the X1D II 50C and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the M200 matches up versus the X1D II 50C with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The whole galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M200 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Canon M200
X1D II 50C | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1320k dot) |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M200 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2019 | June 2019 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon M200 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has sizing of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Examine the Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the M200 against the X1D II 50C.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and X1D II 50C is 88 and 60 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and X1D II 50C.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M200 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you greater detail with its extra 27MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Hasselblad X |
Available lenses | 23 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.60" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,690 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/10000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames per second | 2.7 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 2720x1530 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lbs) | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Pricing at release | $549 | $5,750 |