Clicky

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Kodak Pixpro S-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
61
Overall
56

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Introduced September 2019
  • Replaced the Canon M100
Kodak S-1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 290g - 116 x 68 x 36mm
  • Introduced June 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Overview

The following is a in depth assessment of the Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Canon and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and S-1 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and S-1 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M200 was unveiled 5 years after the S-1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the M200 matches up versus the S-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Kodak S-1

 M200 S-1 
IntroducedSeptember 2019June 2014Newer by 64 months
Display resolution1040k920kCrisper display (+120k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Kodak S-1 over the Canon M200

 S-1 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Kodak S-1

 M200 S-1 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 offers outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Kodak S-1 has proportions of 116mm x 68mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4") having a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).

Contrast the Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the M200 and the S-1.

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and S-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The image underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and S-1.

Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M200 using its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M200 will provide you with more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger M200 will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak S-1 as a Portrait photography camera
75
you can focus manually
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
no external flash support
71
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M200
Street photography with Kodak S-1
82
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
provides touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
85
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak S-1 as a Sports photography camera
75
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
62
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (410 CIPA)
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon M200
Travel photography with Kodak S-1
89
supports bluetooth
provides touch focus
decent MP (24MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
65
better than average battery life (410 CIPA)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon M200
Landscape photography with Kodak S-1
80
you can focus manually
change lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is decent (3")
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
74
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (410 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging factors
Kodak S-1 Vlogging factors
75
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
provides face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lack of image stabilization
missing external microphone port
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
Photography Glossary

Canon M200 vs Kodak S-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Kodak S-1
 Canon EOS M200Kodak Pixpro S-1
General Information
Company Canon Kodak
Model type Canon EOS M200 Kodak Pixpro S-1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-09-25 2014-06-24
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 6000 x 4000 4640 x 3480
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 143 25
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 6.1fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, Red-Eye Reduction, Fill Flash, Flash Off, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain Sync, Slow Sync+ Red-Eye Reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 lb) 290 gr (0.64 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 116 x 68 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 shots 410 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 LB-070
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $549 $250