Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Older Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced September 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Canon M200 and Leica M Typ 240, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and Leica. The resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the M Typ 240 (24MP) is very comparable but the M200 (APS-C) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was manufactured 7 years later than the M Typ 240 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the M200 grades versus the M Typ 240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 & Leica M Typ 240. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Leica M Typ 240
| M200 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2019 |  | September 2012 | Fresher by 86 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Canon M200
| M Typ 240 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Leica M Typ 240
| M200 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon M200 offers outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Leica M Typ 240 has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Examine the Canon M200 and Leica M Typ 240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the M200 versus the M Typ 240.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and M Typ 240 is 88 and 74 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The photograph here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and M Typ 240.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses the exact same resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The M200 has the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF more difficult. The more recent M200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Leica M Typ 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Leica |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Leica M Typ 240 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2012-09-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF-M | Leica M |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 59 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 1% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lb) | 680 gr (1.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 84 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1860 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 500 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $549 | $5,479 |