Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Alternate Name is Typ 262
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon M200 versus Leica M Typ 262, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and Leica. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the M Typ 262 (24MP) is very close but the M200 (APS-C) and M Typ 262 (Full frame) possess different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M200 was revealed 3 years later than the M Typ 262 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the M200 matches up versus the M Typ 262 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS M200 and Leica M Typ 262. The full galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery and Leica M Typ 262 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Leica M Typ 262
| M200 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2019 |  | November 2015 | More recent by 47 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 921k | Sharper display (+119k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Canon M200
| M Typ 262 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Leica M Typ 262
| M200 | M Typ 262 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Leica M Typ 262 has proportions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
See the Canon M200 versus Leica M Typ 262 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the M200 compared to the M Typ 262.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and M Typ 262 is 88 and 77 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The graphic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and M Typ 262.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same MP but different sensor measurements. The M200 provides the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh trickier. The more modern M200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon M200 vs Leica M Typ 262 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Leica M Typ 262 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Leica |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Leica M Typ 262 |
| Alternate name | - | Typ 262 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2015-11-19 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | Maestro |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Leica M |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 59 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | - |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 600g (1.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | BP-SCL2 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $549 | $5,069 |