Clicky

Canon M200 vs Leica TL

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Leica TL front
Portability
85
Imaging
60
Features
58
Overall
59

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Revealed September 2019
  • Succeeded the Canon M100
Leica TL
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12500
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
  • Launched November 2016
  • Refreshed by Leica TL2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon M200 vs Leica TL, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Canon and Leica. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and TL (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The M200 was manufactured 2 years after the TL which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the M200 grades against the TL when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Leica TL

 M200 TL 
LaunchedSeptember 2019November 2016Newer by 36 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Leica TL over the Canon M200

 TL M200 
Display sizing3.7"3"Larger display (+0.7")
Display resolution1230k1040kClearer display (+190k dot)

Common features in the Canon M200 and Leica TL

 M200 TL 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon M200 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Leica TL has specifications of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon M200 vs Leica TL in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the M200 versus the TL.

Canon M200 vs Leica TL size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and TL is 88 and 85 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Leica TL top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and TL.

As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Canon M200 to give you more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent M200 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Leica TL sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 as a Portrait photography camera
Leica TL as a Portrait photography camera
75
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
external flash not possible
76
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography advice
Leica TL Street photography advice
82
tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
offers focus by touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
70
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
supports focus via touch
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 as a Sports photography camera
Leica TL as a Sports photography camera
75
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
55
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography details
Leica TL Travel photography details
89
connects via bluetooth
offers focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
70
supports focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography information
Leica TL Landscape photography information
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
70
has manual focus
change lenses (Leica L mount)
very good size screen (3.7 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging features
Leica TL Vlogging features
75
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
features face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
no image stabilization
no external microphone port
33
built-in touchscreen
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
does not have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Canon M200 vs Leica TL Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Leica TL
 Canon EOS M200Leica TL
General Information
Make Canon Leica
Model type Canon EOS M200 Leica TL
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2019-09-25 2016-11-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 12500
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M Leica L
Total lenses 23 4
Crop factor 1.6 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 6.1 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.50 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, off, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 pounds) 384 gr (0.85 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 photos 400 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 BP-DC13
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $549 $1,009