Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Introduced September 2019
  • Older Model is Canon M100
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Announced March 2014
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-M10 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-M10 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M200 was introduced 5 years later than the E-M10 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M200 matches up against the E-M10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-M10

 M200 E-M10 
AnnouncedSeptember 2019March 2014More recent by 68 months
Screen resolution1040k1037kClearer screen (+3k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Canon M200

 E-M10 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10

 M200 E-M10 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Canon M200 has external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 has specifications of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the M200 and the E-M10.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-M10 is 88 and 82 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and E-M10.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Canon M200 will give you greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher M200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography factors
75
has manual focus
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW files
no external flash support
71
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Canon M200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 as a Street photography camera
82
tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than average (396 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography info
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography info
75
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
lacks phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography details
Olympus E-M10 Travel photography details
89
supports bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
resolution is good (24MP)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
67
comes with touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than average (396 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography advice
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
lack of image stabilization
79
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M10 Vlogging factors
75
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
provides face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lack of image stabilization
does not have mic jack
33
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of mic socket
heavier than average (396g)
Photography Glossary

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10
 Canon EOS M200Olympus OM-D E-M10
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M200 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-09-25 2014-03-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 8 TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 143 81
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.58x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 6.1 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO100)
Flash modes - Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 lb) 396 gr (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 72
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 884
Other
Battery life 315 photos 320 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10))
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $549 $600