Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M200 was introduced 9 years later than the E-P2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the M200 scores versus the E-P2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 & Olympus PEN E-P2. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-P2
M200 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2019 | April 2010 | Fresher by 115 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Canon M200
E-P2 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-P2
M200 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 has got outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M200 versus the E-P2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and E-P2 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and E-P2.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M200 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon M200 will give you greater detail using its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher M200 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2010-04-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lb) | 355 grams (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 images | 300 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $549 | $799 |