Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Announced September 2019
  • Succeeded the Canon M100
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Announced April 2010
  • Older Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-P3
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M200 was introduced 9 years later than the E-P2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the M200 scores versus the E-P2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-P2

 M200 E-P2 
AnnouncedSeptember 2019April 2010Fresher by 115 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Canon M200

 E-P2 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-P2

 M200 E-P2 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 has got outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M200 versus the E-P2.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and E-P2 is 88 and 86 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and E-P2.

All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M200 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon M200 will give you greater detail using its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher M200 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon M200
Portrait photography with Olympus E-P2
75
focusing manually
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
cannot use external flash
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M200
Street photography with Olympus E-P2
82
screen tilts up and down
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography information
Olympus E-P2 Sports photography information
75
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
has phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
low battery power (300 per charge)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
89
supports bluetooth
includes touch to focus
MP count decent (24MP)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
43
lack of Timelapse function
low battery power (300 shots)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon M200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
80
focusing manually
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
no image stabilization
60
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
low battery power (300 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging information
Olympus E-P2 Vlogging information
75
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
features face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
no image stabilization
no microphone jack
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-P2
 Canon EOS M200Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model Canon EOS M200 Olympus PEN E-P2
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2019-09-25 2010-04-22
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 8 TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 143 11
Lens
Lens mount Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 6.1 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 299 grams (0.66 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 56
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 505
Other
Battery life 315 images 300 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E12 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC card
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $549 $799