Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1

Portability
88
Imaging
69
Features
80
Overall
73
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Released September 2019
  • Older Model is Canon M100
Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched May 2010
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL1s
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PL1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M200 was unveiled 9 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the M200 scores against the E-PL1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PL1

 M200 E-PL1 
LaunchedSeptember 2019May 2010Newer by 114 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Canon M200

 E-PL1 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL1

 M200 E-PL1 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL1 has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Analyze the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PL1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M200 and the E-PL1.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-PL1 is 88 and 86 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and E-PL1.

As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M200 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Canon M200 will result in more detail having an extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher M200 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-PL1 Portrait photography information
74
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
external flash not possible
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-PL1 Street photography highlights
82
screen tilts up and down
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
has touch to focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography features
Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography features
74
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
has phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
44
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (290 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon M200
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL1
89
connects via bluetooth
has touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
51
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (290 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Landscape photography camera
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
55
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery power (290 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging highlights
75
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
offers face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone port
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Photography Glossary

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL1
 Canon EOS M200Olympus PEN E-PL1
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M200 Olympus PEN E-PL1
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2019-09-25 2010-05-17
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 8 Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 143 11
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 6.1 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 grams (0.66 pounds) 334 grams (0.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 54
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.1
DXO Low light rating not tested 487
Other
Battery life 315 photographs 290 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC card
Card slots One One
Retail price $549 $288