Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s

Portability
88
Imaging
69
Features
80
Overall
73
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Launched September 2019
  • Older Model is Canon M100
Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Released November 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview

Lets look much closer at the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PL1s, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M200 was released 8 years later than the E-PL1s and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the M200 matches up vs the E-PL1s with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PL1s

 M200 E-PL1s 
ReleasedSeptember 2019November 2010More recent by 108 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Canon M200

 E-PL1s M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL1s

 M200 E-PL1s 
Manual focus More accurate focusing

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 comes with outer dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1s has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Examine the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the M200 and the E-PL1s.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and E-PL1s is 88 and 86 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and E-PL1s.

All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M200 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon M200 will show more detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer M200 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography details
74
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
exports RAW files
cannot use external flash
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-PL1s Street photography highlights
82
screen tilts
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
comes with focus via touch
very good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon M200
Sports photography with Olympus E-PL1s
74
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
44
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery pack (290 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Travel photography camera
89
connects via bluetooth
comes with focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
51
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (290 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography advice
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is good (3")
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
does not have image stabilization
55
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (290 shots)
no Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Vlogging camera
75
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
comes with face detect focus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone port
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect focusing
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL1s
 Canon EOS M200Olympus PEN E-PL1s
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M200 Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2019-09-25 2010-11-16
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 8 Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 143 11
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 6.1fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299 gr (0.66 lb) 334 gr (0.74 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 photos 290 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $549 $599