Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
86 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Replaced the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL6
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL8
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PL7 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PL7 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M200 was introduced 5 years after the E-PL7 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the M200 grades vs the E-PL7 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 and Olympus PEN E-PL7. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery and Olympus E-PL7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PL7
M200 | E-PL7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2019 | September 2014 | More modern by 62 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Canon M200
E-PL7 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL7
M200 | E-PL7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 provides external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL7 has proportions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Look at the Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the M200 and the E-PL7.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-PL7 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and E-PL7.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M200 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Canon M200 will provide you with more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent M200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2014-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 8 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 873 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | 350 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $549 | $499 |