Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Older Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL7
- New Model is Olympus E-PL9
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PL8, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PL8 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PL8 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M200 was released 3 years later than the E-PL8 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the M200 scores versus the E-PL8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 and Olympus PEN E-PL8. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery and Olympus E-PL8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PL8
M200 | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2019 | September 2016 | More recent by 37 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Canon M200
E-PL8 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PL8
M200 | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon M200 has physical dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL8 has sizing of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Compare the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PL8 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the M200 versus the E-PL8.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-PL8 is 88 and 86 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and E-PL8.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon M200 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer M200 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus PEN E-PL8 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 23 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.1fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 357g (0.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $549 | $500 |