Clicky

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1

Portability
88
Imaging
70
Features
80
Overall
74
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM1 front
Portability
89
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Revealed September 2019
  • Earlier Model is Canon M100
Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Released November 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PM2
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PM1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The M200 was announced 7 years after the E-PM1 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the M200 scores versus the E-PM1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-PM1

 M200 E-PM1 
ReleasedSeptember 2019November 2011Newer by 96 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Canon M200

 E-PM1 M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-PM1

 M200 E-PM1 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon M200 features exterior dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PM1 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).

Examine the Canon M200 versus Olympus E-PM1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the M200 versus the E-PM1.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-PM1 is 88 and 89 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and E-PM1.

Plainly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M200 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon M200 will give greater detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher M200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon M200
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM1
75
manual focus
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
can't use external flash
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12MP)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Street photography features
82
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
has touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
75
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Sports photography features
75
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
has phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
49
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
max fps very slow (6.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography details
Olympus E-PM1 Travel photography details
89
connects via bluetooth
has touch focus
decent MP (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
45
does not have Time Lapse function
low MP (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-PM1 Landscape photography features
80
manual focus
swap lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is good (3")
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
65
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PM1 as a Vlogging camera
75
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does not have image stabilization
does not have mic socket
34
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Canon M200 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Olympus E-PM1
 Canon EOS M200Olympus PEN E-PM1
General Information
Brand Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M200 Olympus PEN E-PM1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2019-09-25 2011-11-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 8 TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 6000 x 4000 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 143 35
Lens
Lens mount type Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 6.1fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 299g (0.66 pounds) 265g (0.58 pounds)
Dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 52
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 499
Other
Battery life 315 photographs 330 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E12 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $549 $499