Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
90 Imaging
48 Features
48 Overall
48
Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Replaced the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GF2
- Successor is Panasonic GF5
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Canon M200 and Panasonic GF3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and GF3 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and GF3 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M200 was brought out 8 years after the GF3 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M200 scores against the GF3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Panasonic GF3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Panasonic GF3
| M200 | GF3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2019 |  | August 2011 | More modern by 99 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Canon M200
| GF3 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Panasonic GF3
| M200 | GF3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 features physical dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF3 has measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M200 and Panasonic GF3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the M200 and the GF3.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and GF3 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and GF3.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M200 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon M200 will render more detail having its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher M200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon M200 vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Panasonic |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2011-08-11 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.30 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 264 grams (0.58 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 50 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 459 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $549 | $360 |
