Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2013
- Earlier Model is Pentax Q10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Canon and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and Q7 (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe M200 was released 6 years later than the Q7 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M200 matches up versus the Q7 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 and Pentax Q7. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Pentax Q7
| M200 | Q7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2019 |  | August 2013 | More recent by 75 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Canon M200
| Q7 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Pentax Q7
| M200 | Q7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The Canon M200 has got outer dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Pentax Q7 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the M200 and the Q7.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and Q7 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and Q7.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon M200 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher M200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations
Canon M200 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Pentax Q7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Pentax Q7 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2013-08-08 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Pentax Q |
| Number of lenses | 23 | 8 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
| Flash settings | - | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lb) | 200 grams (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | 250 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $549 | $480 |
