Clicky

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
88
Imaging
69
Features
80
Overall
73
Canon EOS M200 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Canon M200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
  • Launched September 2019
  • Replaced the Canon M100
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2018
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR III
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Canon M200 and Ricoh GR III, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Canon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the GR III (24MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (APS-C).

Photography Glossary

The M200 was brought out 13 months later than the GR III which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the M200 scores versus the GR III for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh GR III

 M200 GR III 
AnnouncedSeptember 2019September 2018Fresher by 13 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k1037kCrisper screen (+3k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Canon M200

 GR III M200 

Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh GR III

 M200 GR III 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 provides exterior dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

Contrast the Canon M200 and Ricoh GR III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the M200 compared to the GR III.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and GR III is 88 and 90 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and GR III.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs however you have to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent M200 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon M200 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography factors
74
focusing manually
decent MP (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
80
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Canon M200 Street photography details
Ricoh GR III Street photography details
82
tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
supports focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
no image stabilization
84
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
boasts touch to focus
lighter than competition (257 grams)
above average ISO range (102,400)
fixed screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Canon M200 Sports photography advice
Ricoh GR III Sports photography advice
74
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
75
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon M200 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR III Travel photography advice
89
supports bluetooth
supports focus by touch
decent MP (24 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (257 grams)
boasts touch to focus
decent megapixels (24MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Canon M200 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR III Landscape photography information
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
no image stabilization
69
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (102,400)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 Vlogging info
Ricoh GR III Vlogging info
75
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
no image stabilization
lack of microphone socket
37
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (257g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Ricoh GR III
 Canon EOS M200Ricoh GR III
General Information
Company Canon Ricoh
Model Canon EOS M200 Ricoh GR III
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2019-09-25 2018-09-25
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 25600 102400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon EF-M fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-16
Macro focus range - 6cm
Amount of lenses 23 -
Crop factor 1.6 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 6.1 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes - Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 299g (0.66 lbs) 257g (0.57 lbs)
Physical dimensions 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 315 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LP-E12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $549 $900