Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
88 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72


88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Canon and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (APS-C).

The M200 was unveiled 9 years later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M200 matches up against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M200 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The full galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
M200 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2019 | ![]() | September 2010 | Fresher by 110 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Canon M200
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
M200 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Canon M200 has outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the M200 compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 88 and 88 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The graphic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Canon M200 to provide you with greater detail having an extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer M200 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 8 | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Number of lenses | 23 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photos | 320 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $549 | $566 |