Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Released September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and WG-70 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M200 was announced 4 months prior to the WG-70 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the M200 grades versus the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Ricoh WG-70
M200 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Canon M200
WG-70 | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Ricoh WG-70
M200 | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2019 | February 2020 | Similar age | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the M200 versus the WG-70.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and WG-70 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and WG-70.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M200 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Canon M200 will deliver more detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M200 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Ricoh WG-70 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2019-09-25 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $549 | $280 |