Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Older Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Updated by Samsung NX210
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Canon M200 versus Samsung NX200, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M200 was released 7 years after the NX200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M200 matches up vs the NX200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Samsung NX200. The complete galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Samsung NX200
| M200 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2019 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 93 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 614k | Crisper screen (+426k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Canon M200
| NX200 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Samsung NX200
| M200 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 has got external measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M200 versus Samsung NX200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the M200 compared to the NX200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and NX200 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The pic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and NX200.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Canon M200 to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent M200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Samsung NX200 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF-M | Samsung NX |
| Number of lenses | 23 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 pounds) | 223 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 images | 330 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $549 | $818 |
