Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Old Model is Samsung NX200
- Refreshed by Samsung NX300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Canon M200 versus Samsung NX210, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. The image resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the NX210 (20MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M200 was manufactured 7 years after the NX210 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M200 grades versus the NX210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 and Samsung NX210. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon M200 Gallery and Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Samsung NX210
| M200 | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2019 |  | August 2012 | More modern by 87 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 614k | Sharper screen (+426k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Canon M200
| NX210 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Samsung NX210
| M200 | NX210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Canon M200 has physical dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Samsung NX210 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon M200 versus Samsung NX210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the M200 vs the NX210.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and NX210 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The image below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and NX210.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon M200 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher M200 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon M200 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Samsung NX210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Samsung NX210 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2012-08-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 23 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.1fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 719 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 330 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $549 | $625 |