Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Older Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Photography Glossary Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Sigma. The image resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the Quattro (29MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the same sensor size (APS-C).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M200 was released 3 years after the Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the M200 scores vs the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sigma Quattro
| M200 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2019 |  | February 2016 | Newer by 44 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Canon M200
| Quattro | M200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 1040k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sigma Quattro
| M200 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon M200 has got external dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the M200 and the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M200 and Quattro is 88 and 63 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and Quattro.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sigma Quattro to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent M200 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon M200 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Sigma |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 8 | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon EF-M | Sigma SA |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.1fps | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | - |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299g (0.66 lbs) | 625g (1.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $549 | $738 |
