Canon M200 vs Sony A3000
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Launched September 2019
- Earlier Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Launched August 2013
- Newer Model is Sony a3500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Canon M200 and Sony A3000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and Sony. The image resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the A3000 (20MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M200 was announced 6 years later than the A3000 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M200 matches up against the A3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Sony Alpha A3000. The whole galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony A3000
| M200 | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2019 |  | August 2013 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Canon M200
| A3000 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony A3000
| M200 | A3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Canon M200 comes with outside dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Sony A3000 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 and Sony A3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the M200 versus the A3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and A3000 is 88 and 69 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and A3000.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Canon M200 to give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger M200 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon M200 vs Sony A3000 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha A3000 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2019-09-25 | 2013-08-27 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 23 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | - | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 lb) | 411 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1068 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 images | 470 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $549 | $398 |