Canon M200 vs Sony A7c
88 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
78 Imaging
74 Features
88 Overall
79
Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Released September 2019
- Replaced the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Introduced September 2020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Canon M200 vs Sony A7c, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Canon and Sony. The resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the A7c (24MP) is pretty well matched but the M200 (APS-C) and A7c (Full frame) have different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M200 was launched 11 months before the A7c so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M200 matches up against the A7c when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 and Sony Alpha A7c. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery and Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony A7c
| M200 | A7c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 922k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Canon M200
| A7c | M200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2020 | September 2019 | Fresher by 11 months | |
| Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony A7c
| M200 | A7c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Canon M200 enjoys physical measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Sony A7c has specifications of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") with a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check the Canon M200 vs Sony A7c in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M200 versus the A7c.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and A7c is 88 and 78 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and A7c.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The M200 features the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field harder. The older M200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Sony A7c Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha A7c | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha A7c |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2019-09-25 | 2020-09-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 8 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 23 | 122 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.1fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lb) | 509 gr (1.12 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 images | 740 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $549 | $1,800 |