Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Released September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-C3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Canon M200 and Sony NEX-3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Canon and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M200 was released 9 years after the NEX-3 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the M200 scores vs the NEX-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The complete galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony NEX-3
| M200 | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2019 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 114 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Canon M200
| NEX-3 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony NEX-3
| M200 | NEX-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M200 comes with physical dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has sizing of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Canon M200 and Sony NEX-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the M200 vs the NEX-3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and NEX-3 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M200 and NEX-3.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon M200 to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern M200 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2019-09-25 | 2010-06-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 8 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Number of lenses | 23 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lb) | 297 gr (0.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 68 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.0 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 830 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 330 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $549 | $0 |