Canon M200 vs Sony a3500
88 Imaging
70 Features
80 Overall
74
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Announced September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Launched March 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony A3000
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Canon M200 versus Sony a3500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe M200 was manufactured 5 years later than the a3500 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the M200 scores against the a3500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 and Sony Alpha a3500. The entire galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony a3500
| M200 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2019 |  | March 2014 | More recent by 68 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Canon M200
| a3500 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony a3500
| M200 | a3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon M200 features exterior dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Sony a3500 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Canon M200 versus Sony a3500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the M200 versus the a3500.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and a3500 is 88 and 69 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M200 and a3500.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Canon M200 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer M200 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon M200 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2019-09-25 | 2014-03-21 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | BIONZ image |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 23 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.1 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
| Flash settings | - | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 gr (0.66 lb) | 411 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 shots | 470 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $549 | $398 |
