Canon M200 vs Sony A6300
88 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Previous Model is Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A6000
- Newer Model is Sony A6500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Canon M200 versus Sony A6300, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Canon and Sony. The resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the A6300 (24MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor size (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M200 was brought out 3 years after the A6300 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M200 matches up vs the A6300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Sony A6300
| M200 | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2019 | February 2016 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 922k | Clearer screen (+118k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Canon M200
| A6300 | M200 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Sony A6300
| M200 | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon M200 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Compare the Canon M200 versus Sony A6300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the M200 vs the A6300.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and A6300 is 88 and 83 respectively.
Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The pic here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and A6300.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of images however you need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent M200 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon M200 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Sony |
| Model | Canon EOS M200 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2016-02-03 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 23 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) | 404 grams (0.89 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 315 photos | 400 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E12 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $549 | $889 |