Clicky

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2

Portability
85
Imaging
66
Features
76
Overall
70
Canon EOS M3 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs

Canon M3
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Canon EF-M Mount
  • 366g - 111 x 68 x 44mm
  • Introduced February 2015
  • Replacement is Canon M6
Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon M3 and Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the M3 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the M3 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M3 was launched 21 months after the E-PM2 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the M3 grades against the E-PM2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon M3 over the Olympus E-PM2

 M3 E-PM2 
RevealedFebruary 2015May 2013Newer by 21 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Canon M3

 E-PM2 M3 

Common features in the Canon M3 and Olympus E-PM2

 M3 E-PM2 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Canon M3 offers external measurements of 111mm x 68mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 366 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Contrast the Canon M3 and Olympus E-PM2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the M3 versus the E-PM2.

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M3 and E-PM2 is 85 and 89 respectively.

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M3 and E-PM2.

To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M3 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Canon M3 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger M3 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Canon M3
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM2
79
you can focus manually
good megapixels (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
71
manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon M3
Street photography with Olympus E-PM2
79
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
comes with touch focus
lack of image stabilization
79
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon M3 Sports photography information
Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography information
61
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
comes with phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.2 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
not so great battery (250 per charge)
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Canon M3 Travel photography details
Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography details
73
comes with touch focus
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery (250 per charge)
66
boasts focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Canon M3 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography features
68
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Canon EF-M mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good megapixels (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
not so great battery (250 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
74
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lack of Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon M3
Vlogging with Olympus E-PM2
80
screen is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone jack
lack of image stabilization
36
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon M3 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M3 and Olympus E-PM2
 Canon EOS M3Olympus PEN E-PM2
General Information
Company Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS M3 Olympus PEN E-PM2
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2015-02-06 2013-05-21
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 25600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 49 35
Lens
Lens support Canon EF-M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 23 107
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.2fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m (at ISO 100) 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1)
Flash options Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 366 gr (0.81 pounds) 269 gr (0.59 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 68 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 72 72
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.8 12.2
DXO Low light rating 1169 932
Other
Battery life 250 pictures 360 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E17 BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $481 $448