Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5
79 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9270d/9270d15f6973958476063fb2760ce6c7640f8bdf" alt="Canon EOS M50 Mark II front Canon EOS M50 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 387g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Announced October 2020
- Earlier Model is Canon M50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Announced October 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-P3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the M50 II (24MP) and E-P5 (16MP) and the M50 II (APS-C) and E-P5 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The M50 II was revealed 7 years after the E-P5 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Canon M50 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M50 II grades versus the E-P5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-P5. The full galleries are viewable at Canon M50 II Gallery and Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 II over the Olympus E-P5
M50 II | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | ![]() | October 2013 | Newer by 86 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Canon M50 II
E-P5 | M50 II |
---|
Common features in the Canon M50 II and Olympus E-P5
M50 II | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Canon M50 II features outside measurements of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") having a weight of 387 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus E-P5 has specifications of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check the Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M50 II versus the E-P5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05e8f/05e8f9f55ca01e6e6491ec5cd0be9e49c9dc1b3f" alt="Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 size comparison Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M50 II and E-P5 is 79 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c800/8c800e78a21396ab71cbaa1eb4dd7315aa49d85f" alt="Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 top view buttons comparison Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 top view buttons comparison"
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M50 II and E-P5.
As you can see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M50 II having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Canon M50 II will produce extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more modern M50 II will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fd9c/4fd9cd3834bf30686d29b82ef81f1aaa7f1d5307" alt="Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 sensor size comparison Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 sensor size comparison"
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/584b9/584b9d6ee51e38749f0b190f4a0f29804eb539be" alt="Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-10-14 | 2013-10-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 23 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 387 gr (0.85 lb) | 420 gr (0.93 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 895 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 305 shots | 330 shots |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $599 | $389 |