Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9
79 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 387g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Released October 2020
- Previous Model is Canon M50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Canon M50 II and Olympus E-PL9, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the M50 II (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the M50 II (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M50 II was launched 2 years later than the E-PL9 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Canon M50 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the M50 II matches up against the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are available at Canon M50 II Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 II over the Olympus E-PL9
M50 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2020 | February 2018 | More recent by 33 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Canon M50 II
E-PL9 | M50 II |
---|
Common features in the Canon M50 II and Olympus E-PL9
M50 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same display resolution | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon M50 II features external measurements of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") and a weight of 387 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Check out the Canon M50 II and Olympus E-PL9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M50 II versus the E-PL9.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M50 II and E-PL9 is 79 and 85 respectively.
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M50 II and E-PL9.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M50 II because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Canon M50 II will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern M50 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M50 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-10-14 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 23 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | - | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 387 gr (0.85 lbs) | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 305 photos | 350 photos |
Battery form | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $599 |