Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1
79 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 387g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Released October 2020
- Previous Model is Canon M50
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2014
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Canon M50 II versus Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Canon and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the M50 II (24MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the M50 II (APS-C) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe M50 II was revealed 6 years after the Q-S1 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon M50 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M50 II matches up vs the Q-S1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M50 Mark II and Pentax Q-S1. The full galleries are provided at Canon M50 II Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 II over the Pentax Q-S1
| M50 II | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2020 |  | August 2014 | More modern by 76 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Canon M50 II
| Q-S1 | M50 II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon M50 II and Pentax Q-S1
| M50 II | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon M50 II features external dimensions of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") having a weight of 387 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Canon M50 II versus Pentax Q-S1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M50 II against the Q-S1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M50 II and Q-S1 is 79 and 92 respectively.
Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M50 II and Q-S1.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M50 II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon M50 II will deliver greater detail because of its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger M50 II will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Canon M50 II vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Pentax |
| Model | Canon EOS M50 Mark II | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-10-14 | 2014-08-04 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Pentax Q |
| Amount of lenses | 23 | 8 |
| Crop factor | 1.6 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 387g (0.85 lbs) | 203g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 305 images | 250 images |
| Battery type | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $599 | $250 |
