Canon EOS M50 vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 II: A Comprehensive Mirrorless Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts

I’ve spent countless hours in the field, juggling cameras of various makes and models, fine-tuning my understanding of what truly matters to photographers - from portraitists chasing flawless skin tones to wildlife shooters demanding blistering autofocus in challenging light. Today, we’re pitting two well-respected mirrorless models against one another: the Canon EOS M50, an entry-level APS-C camera that burst onto the market in early 2018, and the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II, a more seasoned advanced mirrorless compact powerhouse announced in 2015. While both appeal to mirrorless fans, they cater to somewhat different priorities and workflows.

I’ve run these cameras through my standard evaluation battery - covering sensor tech, autofocus, ergonomics, real-world image quality across genres, video features, and more - to help you determine which suits your photographic ambitions best. Throughout the article, I'll weave in insights from my hands-on experience and real shooting scenarios, supplemented by essential comparisons, images, and ratings.

Let’s dive deep.

Getting Acquainted: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

Often overlooked but critical to the shooting experience is how a camera feels in your hands during long sessions. Handling can make or break your enjoyment, especially if you shoot across demanding scenarios like sports or landscape hikes.

Canon’s EOS M50 sports a compact SLR-inspired design with dimensions measuring 116 x 88 x 59 mm and a weight of 390 g, including battery and card. In use, the M50 is refreshingly small and light, appealing to shooters who travel light or want a camera that doesn’t intimidate newcomers. The textured grip, albeit petite, balances well for most hand sizes, though those with larger paws may find it skimpier than desired.

Olympus’s OM-D E-M5 II is sturdier and chunkier, with a body size of 124 x 85 x 45 mm and a heftier 469 g. Its magnesium alloy shell adds durability and weather sealing (more on that later). The grip is more pronounced compared to the M50, lending better confidence for handheld shooting, especially with longer lenses. The compact depth makes it surprisingly pocketable despite the extra weight.

Both cameras feature fully articulating 3-inch touchscreens that facilitate shooting at awkward angles and selfies, but their execution differs subtly:

The M50 sports a clean, simple top plate with accessible dials for exposure modes and an intuitive joystick for AF point selection. This layout serves beginners well, though pros may crave extra customizable buttons.

The E-M5 II’s control layout is more sophisticated, featuring dual control dials and dedicated function buttons - standard fare for Olympus’s OM-D series. While it ups the learning curve moderately, it grants quicker manual operation once you acclimate.

In sum, if portability and beginner-friendly handling win your vote, the Canon M50 edges ahead. For those prioritizing a robust grip and quick manual adjustments, Olympus’s E-M5 II holds its ground.

Sensor Characteristics and Image Quality: APS-C vs. Four Thirds Battle

At the heart of any camera is its sensor - a decisive factor affecting image quality, dynamic range, low-light capability, and even lens choices.

The Canon M50 houses a 24.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 22.3 x 14.9 mm, yielding an active sensor area of 332.27 mm². Canon’s DIGIC 8 image processor partners with this sensor to deliver solid detail rendition and fast processing, with native ISO ranging from 100–25600 (expandable to 51200). It uses a traditional anti-aliasing filter, which slightly softens the image but reduces moiré artifacts.

On the other hand, the Olympus E-M5 II features a 16MP Four Thirds MOS sensor, sized at 17.3 x 13 mm (224.90 mm² sensor area), almost 33% smaller in surface area than the Canon. Coupled with the TruePic VII processor and an anti-aliasing filter, it pushes ISO similarly high (native 200–25600), but its base ISO can be pushed lower to 100 in boosted modes.

From hands-on testing in varied lighting conditions, the M50 generally delivers cleaner images in low light, attributable primarily to its larger sensor gathering more photons per pixel. Its dynamic range is respectable for an APS-C chip in this class, holding onto details in shadows and highlights without too aggressive recovery.

The E-M5 II sensor renders excellent color with a notably punchy palette, a signature of Olympus sensors, but its Four Thirds size imposes more noise at higher ISOs compared to Canon’s APS-C. The sharper differences appear at ISO 3200 and above; Canon’s images stay usable with better tonal gradation, while Olympus results show more grain, though still acceptable with noise reduction.

In portrait shooting, Canon’s higher resolution helps render fine details such as eyelashes and skin textures more faithfully, while Olympus’s sensor is more than adequate for web-sized or casual prints.

The Canon M50 benefits significantly from its native EF-M lens lineup, though still limited to about 23 lenses, whereas Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds mount boasts a massive, mature lens ecosystem of over 100 lenses, including many third-party options such as Sigma and Voigtländer, catering to everything from ultra-wide landscapes to ultra-macro delights.

So, in terms of sheer technical image quality, Canon offers the advantage in resolution and low-light performance; Olympus counters with sensor stabilization and a vast lens arsenal.

Autofocus Technology in the Field: Speed and Accuracy Matters

Autofocus systems can move a camera from frustrating to effortless - especially vital in portraits, wildlife, and fast-paced sports.

The Canon M50 incorporates a hybrid system with 143 autofocus points, combining phase-detection and contrast-detection on its CMOS sensor. This feature grants quick subject acquisition (approximately 0.03 seconds in bright light), with eye AF (face and eye detection) included for reliable tracking during portraits. Continuous AF works well in video and burst modes.

The Olympus E-M5 II uses an 81-point contrast-detection AF system. While some may criticize contrast AF for slower acquisition versus phase detection, Olympus compensates through improved algorithms and lens communication. Still, it lags slightly behind Canon's hybrid system in responsiveness, particularly under challenging light or fast-moving subjects.

During wildlife shoots or sports trials, I observed the M50 tracking birds in flight or soccer players reasonably well, though not at the professional sports camera level - 10 fps burst shooting assists here.

Olympus caps at 10 fps as well but with slightly slower AF recalculation between shots, leading to occasional missed frames for unpredictable fast subjects.

However, Olympus shines with its five-axis sensor-shift image stabilization that not only steadies handheld shooting but also subtly assists focus precision by providing stable framing, useful in macro and landscape photography.

Canon’s M50 has image stabilization only within lenses (IS), not the sensor, so performance heavily depends on your lens selection.

In face and eye tracking, Canon’s M50 autofocus is generally more confident and precise, particularly for portraits and casual wildlife use.

Image Stabilization: Hold Steady or Miss the Shot

While many photographers rely on guts and gimbal rigs for motion control, in-body image stabilization (IBIS) is an increasingly indispensable technological safety net.

The Olympus E-M5 II truly impresses here with its sensor-based 5-axis stabilization, capable of compensating up to 5 stops of camera shake. In practice, this proved invaluable for low-light handheld shooting - night street photography became more accessible, and macro focusing was markedly steady. I managed sharp handheld shots at shutter speeds slower than theoretically safe.

The Canon M50 lacks IBIS, relying solely on lens-based IS systems native to EF-M lenses. While Canon’s IS lenses are effective, the M50 body itself offers no stabilization, limiting you to using optically stabilized lenses or external rigs for steadiness. This omission is noteworthy considering competitive models of its era.

For videographers or handheld enthusiasts, Olympus has the upper hand with vastly better stabilization performance.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for the Elements?

Depending on your shooting environment, a camera that can withstand dust, moisture, and rough handling is a non-negotiable.

Olympus’s OM-D E-M5 II boasts partial weather sealing, including dust and splash resistance, thanks to its robust magnesium alloy chassis and sealed buttons. I took it out in light rain and dusty trails without worry. This feature positions the E-M5 II as favorable for travel, adventure, and landscape photographers who face unpredictable weather.

Canon’s EOS M50, however, has no official weather sealing and uses a polycarbonate shell, which feels less rugged. Its small size and lighter weight render it easy to tuck away, but extra care is needed in harsh conditions to avoid damage.

Those eyeing reliability in challenging outdoor situations will appreciate Olympus’s superior build resilience.

Ergonomics and User Interface: How Smooth Is Your Shooting Flow?

When you’re juggling settings on the fly - capturing crucial moments - a well-thought-out control layout and interface mean the difference between nailing the shot and missing it.

Both cameras feature fully articulating 3” touchscreens, with about 1,040K dot resolution, comfortable for framing and menu navigation.

Canon’s touchscreen is highly responsive with intuitive touch AF and menu control. Its GUI is clean, especially inviting for entry-level users, with helpful icons and tips.

Olympus’s screen is similarly articulated but, while touch-enabled, the UI can feel more cluttered due to its advanced features. Olympus menus have a steeper learning curve with multiple submenus, but seasoned users will appreciate the comprehensive customization.

Canon’s rear joystick and dedicated buttons make quick AF point selection natural, whereas Olympus uses a combination of dials and buttons, catering to more manual enthusiasts.

If you prefer a gentle learning curve and touch-centric operation, Canon’s interface wins here - though Olympus rewards time spent mastering its system with granular control.

Burst Shooting and Buffer Performance: Catching the Action

For action, sports, or wildlife shooters, frame rates and buffer depth impact how often you freeze decisive moments.

Both cameras boast respectable 10 fps continuous shooting in RAW or JPEG.

However, Canon’s M50 buffer fills quickly due to its slower UHS-I SD card interface, limiting bursts to about 22 compressed RAW frames before slowdown. For moderate action sequences, this is adequate, but serious burst shooting is constrained.

Olympus’s OM-D E-M5 II also limits speed due to its USB 2.0 and card interface but benefits from more efficient RAW compression and buffer management, sustaining bursts about as long as Canon in practical shooting.

Neither camera will rival professional sports bodies with 20+ fps bursts, but for casual action and wildlife sequences, these numbers suffice.

Video Capabilities: The Storytelling Edge

Videographers have become a sizable constituency in the mirrorless user base. How do these cameras stack up?

The Canon EOS M50 shoots UHD 4K video at 23.98 fps, albeit with a 1.5x crop on the sensor, which restricts wide-angle access and somewhat limits the full sensor advantage. Video bitrate maxes at 120 Mbps in MOV format with H.264 compression. Canon supports a microphone input but no headphone jack, limiting audio monitoring during recording. Dual Pixel autofocus technology provides smooth, reliable focusing in video mode, a standout feature for vlogging and documentary shooters.

Olympus E-M5 II maxes out at Full HD 1080p (60 fps) video, with no 4K option, a significant downside by today’s standards. Video compression includes MPEG-4, H.264, and Motion JPEG. It also includes a microphone input but no headphone jack. Olympus’s sensor stabilization is a remarkable asset in video, delivering smooth handheld footage without gimbals.

If 4K video is on your plate and autofocus smoothness matters, Canon takes the lead. For stabilized 1080p handheld shooting, Olympus holds some sway.

Battery Life and Storage: When the Clock Ticks

Field shooting often strains batteries, so efficient power use is vital.

Canon’s M50 has a rated battery life of approximately 235 shots per charge (CIPA standard). In real-world mixed use, expect 200–250 images before needing a recharge or spare battery. It uses an internal NP-encased battery pack (LP-E12), which means bringing a spare is crucial for prolonged sessions.

Olympus’s E-M5 II fares better, offering around 310 shots per battery charge using the BLN-1 battery pack. The improved efficiency, paired with robust power management, results in noticeably longer shooting days without swapping batteries.

Both cameras support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-I compatible in Canon’s case), but Canon’s lack of USB charging support means you must rely on dedicated chargers.

For extended outings, Olympus thus offers a tangible endurance advantage.

Wireless and Connectivity: Share On the Fly?

Both cameras integrate Wi-Fi connectivity allowing remote shooting and image transfer.

Canon’s M50 adds Bluetooth and NFC support for quicker pairing and low-energy connections, enhancing smartphone tethering and easy sharing. The Canon Camera Connect app proves stable for remote control and image browsing.

Olympus E-M5 II features Wi-Fi only, lacking Bluetooth or NFC, which can make initial pairing more tedious but still effective.

Neither model supports GPS, which may disappoint travel photographers who crave geotagging without extra accessories.

How They Perform Across Photography Genres

Putting theory into practice, I tested both cameras across major genres with typical real-world scenarios.

Canon M50 front Canon M50 screen back Olympus E M5 II front Olympus E M5 II screen back

Portraits: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye AF

Canon’s higher resolution and dual pixel AF make nailing eye focus straightforward. Bokeh, aided by APS-C sensor size, looks more natural and creamy through fast EF-M primes. Skin tones render pleasingly warm without saturation overload.

Olympus paints subjects with vivid color but due to smaller sensor and fewer megapixels, background blur is less smooth, and eye AF precision trails slightly.

Landscapes: Detail and Dynamic Range

The M50 retains more detail in RAW files and offers wider dynamic range. Olympus’s in-body stabilization helps handheld shots at low shutter speeds, useful for twilight scenes, but fine detail lags behind Canon.

Weather sealing for Olympus further enhances suitability for outdoor landscape treks.

Wildlife and Sports: Focus and Burst

Canon’s fast hybrid AF and 10 fps burst edge Olympus in tracking action, though Olympus’s stabilization aids frame steadiness.

Both cameras struggle in extremely low light but hold adequate performance up to ISO 3200 for wildlife ambient shots.

Street and Travel: Portability and Discretion

Canon’s smaller form factor wins for street shooters who prefer a discreet rig, while Olympus’s sturdier body and weather resistance appeal to travelers confronting variable conditions.

Battery life, in this case, leans towards Olympus for longer outings.

Macro and Night/Astro Photography

Olympus’s stabilization excels in macro shooting, allowing sharper close-ups handheld. Focus bracketing and stacking as implemented are available on the E-M5 II, absent on Canon, facilitating depth-of-field extension.

Night photography favors Canon’s cleaner high ISO output; however, Olympus’s longer shutter silent mode helps reduce shake in astrophotography.

Video Recording

Canon’s 4K and superior autofocus performance mark it as the better tool. Olympus still records fluid stabilized 1080p with decent quality.

The Verdict and Who Should Buy Which?

Both cameras have served their markets well and offer compelling features for their class and era. Your choice hinges on priorities:

• Choose the Canon EOS M50 if you want:

  • Higher resolution APS-C sensor with better low-light and dynamic range
  • Reliable and fast hybrid autofocus with eye detection for portraits and video
  • 4K video recording with effective autofocus
  • Compact, lightweight body suited for everyday carry and street photography
  • Bluetooth and NFC wireless connectivity for seamless sharing

• Choose the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II if you want:

  • Robust, weather-sealed body with superior build quality for outdoor use
  • Five-axis in-body stabilization supporting all lenses with up to 5 stops compensation
  • Extensive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem for diverse focal needs
  • Advanced manual control layout and features like focus stacking and bracketing
  • Longer battery life aiding extended shooting days
  • Superb handheld macro and landscape flexibility

The Canon M50 costs about $779, whereas the Olympus E-M5 II is generally available for around $699, a slight price edge given Olympus’s advanced features and better build.

Ultimately, if image quality, video capabilities, and user friendliness are paramount, Canon M50 is a firm recommendation. For photographers requiring durability, in-body stabilization, and advanced shooting features in an all-weather package, Olympus E-M5 II is an enduring contender.

Wrapping Up

These two cameras embody the shift from DSLR dominance to mirrorless versatility. While the Canon M50 symbolizes accessible APS-C innovation with robust autofocus and video, the Olympus E-M5 II stands as a testament to advanced stabilization and rugged, manual control.

In evaluating cameras, I lean on extensive field use and a multi-discipline testing regimen. These models don’t reinvent the wheel but each carve their niche beautifully, offering solid choices tailored to different photographic tastes.

No matter which path you take, both will enable creativity across portraits, landscapes, street, wildlife, and beyond.

Happy shooting!

If you want to explore more camera comparisons or have questions specific to your style, feel free to drop a comment. Sharing practical experience helps us all shoot smarter.

Thank you for reading.

gallery #camerareview #mirrorless #photographygear