Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240
62 Imaging
77 Features
88 Overall
81
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 30MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 40000 (Increase to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 660g - 136 x 98 x 84mm
- Launched September 2018
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Canon R versus Leica M Typ 240, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Canon and Leica. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the R (30MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (Full frame).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe R was unveiled 6 years later than the M Typ 240 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the R matches up versus the M Typ 240 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS R and Leica M Typ 240. The full galleries are available at Canon R Gallery and Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R over the Leica M Typ 240
| R | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | September 2012 | More recent by 73 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 2100k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1180k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Canon R
| M Typ 240 | R |
|---|
Common features in the Canon R and Leica M Typ 240
| R | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus |
Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon R has external measurements of 136mm x 98mm x 84mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 240 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Check out the Canon R versus Leica M Typ 240 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the R against the M Typ 240.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R and M Typ 240 is 62 and 74 respectively.
Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The graphic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the R and M Typ 240.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Canon R to provide extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern R provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon R vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
| Canon EOS R | Leica M Typ 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Leica |
| Model type | Canon EOS R | Leica M Typ 240 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2018-09-05 | 2012-09-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 30 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 6720 x 4480 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Max native ISO | 40000 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 5655 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Canon RF | Leica M |
| Available lenses | 17 | 59 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 2,100 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 1% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 480 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (with LP-E6N only) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 660 grams (1.46 pounds) | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 98 x 84mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.3") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 89 | 84 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.5 | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 2742 | 1860 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 photos | 500 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $2,299 | $5,479 |