Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II
62 Imaging
77 Features
88 Overall
81
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 30MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 40000 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 660g - 136 x 98 x 84mm
- Revealed September 2018
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Canon R versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the R (30MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the R (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe R was introduced 24 months after the E-M1 II which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the R grades against the E-M1 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS R & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are available at Canon R Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R over the Olympus E-M1 II
R | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | September 2016 | Newer by 24 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 2100k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1063k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Canon R
E-M1 II | R |
---|
Common features in the Canon R and Olympus E-M1 II
R | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon R has exterior measurements of 136mm x 98mm x 84mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
See the Canon R versus Olympus E-M1 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the R against the E-M1 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the R and E-M1 II is 62 and 68 respectively.
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specifications. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the R and E-M1 II.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The R with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Canon R will offer more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer R should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Canon EOS R | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS R | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-09-05 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 30 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6720 x 4480 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 40000 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 50 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 5655 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon RF | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 17 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,100 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 480 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (with LP-E6N only) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 98 x 84mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.3") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 89 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.5 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 2742 | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD card (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Cost at release | $2,299 | $1,700 |