Canon R vs Samsung SL30
62 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 30MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 40000 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 660g - 136 x 98 x 84mm
- Released September 2018
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally Known as ES15
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Canon R vs Samsung SL30, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Canon and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the R (30MP) and SL30 (10MP) and the R (Full frame) and SL30 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe R was brought out 9 years later than the SL30 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL30 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the R matches up vs the SL30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS R and Samsung SL30. The entire galleries are available at Canon R Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R over the Samsung SL30
| R | SL30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2018 | February 2009 | More recent by 117 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 2100k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1870k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Canon R
| SL30 | R |
|---|
Common features in the Canon R and Samsung SL30
| R | SL30 |
|---|
Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon R has outside measurements of 136mm x 98mm x 84mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) while the Samsung SL30 has sizing of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Canon R vs Samsung SL30 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the R compared to the SL30.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the R and SL30 is 62 and 95 respectively.
Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The visual here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the R and SL30.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The R because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Canon R will deliver greater detail having its extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher R should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon R vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
| Canon EOS R | Samsung SL30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon EOS R | Samsung SL30 |
| Also called | - | ES15 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2018-09-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 30 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 6720 x 4480 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 40000 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 5655 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon RF | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 17 | - |
| Crop factor | 1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 2,100 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 480 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes (with LP-E6N only) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 660 gr (1.46 pounds) | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 98 x 84mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.3") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 89 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 2742 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD card (UHS-II supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $2,299 | $93 |