Clicky

Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1

Portability
69 Imaging
71 Features
85 Overall
76
Canon EOS R10 front
 
Fujifilm X-H1 front
Portability
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74

Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Key Specs

Canon R10
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 426g - 123 x 88 x 83mm
  • Released May 2022
Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
  • Announced February 2018
  • Successor is Fujifilm X-H2
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the R10 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The R10 was introduced 4 years later than the Fujifilm X-H1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the R10 matches up versus the Fujifilm X-H1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon R10 over the Fujifilm X-H1

          

          

            
 R10 Fujifilm X-H1 
AnnouncedMay 2022February 2018Fresher by 52 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen  Take selfies
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Canon R10

          

          

            
 Fujifilm X-H1 R10 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon R10 and Fujifilm X-H1

          

          

            
 R10 Fujifilm X-H1 
Manually focus  Very accurate focus
Screen size3.00"3"Same screen sizing
Screen resolution1040k1040kEqual screen resolution
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Canon R10 features physical measurements of 123mm x 88mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Fujifilm X-H1 has sizing of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the R10 vs the Fujifilm X-H1.
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R10 and Fujifilm X-H1 is 69 and 61 respectively.
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the R10 and Fujifilm X-H1.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of images but you will need to factor the release date  of the cameras into account. The more modern R10 provides an edge in sensor technology.

            Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Canon R10 Portrait photography details
Fujifilm X-H1 Portrait photography details
82
 manual focus
 decent MP (24MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 features face detection focus
 saves RAW files
80
 has manual focus
 resolution is good (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 offers face detect autofocus
 exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
 Canon R10 as a Street photography camera
 Fujifilm X-H1 as a Street photography camera
70
 screen can move to multiple angles
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 features touch to focus
 above average ISO range (32,000)
 lack of image stabilization
 heavier than competition in class (426g)
76
 screen tilts
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 exports RAW files
 has focus via touch
 weather proofing
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Canon R10 Sports photography factors
Fujifilm X-H1 Sports photography factors
78
 silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
 decent MP (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 features tracking autofocus
 better than average battery (450 shots)
 supports phase detect auto focus
 lack of image stabilization
78
 great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
 quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 resolution is good (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 offers tracking focus
 weather proofing
 has phase detect autofocus
 terrible battery power (310 per charge)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
Canon R10 Travel photography information
Fujifilm X-H1 Travel photography information
76
 better than average battery (450 CIPA)
 connects via bluetooth
 features touch to focus
 decent MP (24MP)
 has built in flash
 display is selfie friendly
 heavier than competition in class (426g)
64
 weather proofing
 connects via bluetooth
 has focus via touch
 resolution is good (24 megapixels)
 terrible battery power (310 per charge)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Landscape Comparison
Canon R10 Landscape photography advice
Fujifilm X-H1 Landscape photography advice
79
 manual focus
 swap lenses (Canon RF mount)
 pretty good screen size (3.00")
 decent MP (24MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 above average ISO range (32,000)
 saves RAW files
 better than average battery (450 per charge)
 lack of image stabilization
78
 has manual focus
 interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
 screen size is good (3 inch)
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 resolution is good (24MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 does not have anti aliasing filter
 exports RAW files
 weather proofing
 has dual storage slots
 terrible battery power (310 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R10 Vlogging highlights
Fujifilm X-H1 Vlogging highlights
70
 display is selfie friendly
 has touchscreen
 features face detection focus
 high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
 comes with external mic socket
 lack of image stabilization
 heavier than competition in class (426g)
35
 has touchscreen
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 offers face detect autofocus
 great video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
 has mic jack
 doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary
        
                
        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-H1 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R10 and Fujifilm X-H1
 Canon EOS R10Fujifilm X-H1
General Information
Company Canon FujiFilm
Model Canon EOS R10 Fujifilm X-H1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2022-05-24 2018-02-14
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - X-Processor Pro
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 22.2 x 14.8mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 328.6mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 32000 12800
Highest boosted ISO 51200 51200
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW data    
Minimum boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect focusing    
Contract detect focusing    
Phase detect focusing    
Number of focus points 651 325
Lens
Lens mount Canon RF Fujifilm X
Available lenses 35 54
Crop factor 1.6 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3.00 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 3,690 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.6x 0.75x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 15.0 frames per second 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 6m at ISO 100 no built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Highest flash sync 1/200 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC -
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 4096x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB Yes Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 426 gr (0.94 lb) 673 gr (1.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 88 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 450 photographs 310 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E17 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage Single UHS-II SD card slot Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Storage slots Single Two
Cost at launch $879 $1,300