Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200
Portability
69 Imaging
71 Features
85 Overall
76
69 Imaging
71 Features
85 Overall
76
Portability
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Key Specs
Canon R10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 426g - 123 x 88 x 83mm
- Announced May 2022
Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Introduced January 2020
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Canon R10 versus Fujifilm X-T200, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the R10 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe R10 was brought out 2 years later than the Fujifilm X-T200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a quick overview of how the R10 matches up vs the Fujifilm X-T200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS R10 and Fujifilm X-T200. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon R10 Gallery and Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R10 over the Fujifilm X-T200
| R10 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | January 2020 | More recent by 29 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Canon R10
| Fujifilm X-T200 | R10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 2780k |  | 1040k | Sharper screen (+1740k dot) |
Common features in the Canon R10 and Fujifilm X-T200
| R10 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Both are selfie friendly | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon R10 offers exterior dimensions of 123mm x 88mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Fujifilm X-T200 has measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Analyze the Canon R10 versus Fujifilm X-T200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the R10 versus the Fujifilm X-T200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the R10 and Fujifilm X-T200 is 69 and 80 respectively.
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the R10 and Fujifilm X-T200.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you might want to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern R10 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon R10 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm X-T200 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Canon R10 as a Street photography camera
Fujifilm X-T200 as a Street photography camera
screen articulates fully
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
offers touch to focus
great ISO range (32,000)
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (426 grams)
fully articulated screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
supports focus via touch
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Canon R10 Sports photography highlights
Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography highlights
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
great battery (450 shots)
sensor has phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
not so great battery power (270 per charge)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon R10
Travel photography with Fujifilm X-T200
great battery (450 CIPA)
connects via bluetooth
offers touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competitors in class (426g)
connects via bluetooth
supports focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
not so great battery power (270 shots)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon R10
Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-T200
has manual focus
swap lenses (Canon RF mount)
screen is a decent size (3.00 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great ISO range (32,000)
saves RAW formats
great battery (450 shots)
lack of image stabilization
focusing manually
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
not so great battery power (270 per charge)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Canon R10 as a Vlogging camera
Fujifilm X-T200 as a Vlogging camera
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
has face detection focusing
high video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone support
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (426g)
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with mic jack
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon R10 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Specifications
| Canon EOS R10 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon EOS R10 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2022-05-24 | 2020-01-22 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.2 x 14.8mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 328.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 32000 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | 51200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 651 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Total lenses | 35 | 54 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3.00 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 2,780 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.6x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6m at ISO 100 | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/200 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 gr (0.94 lb) | 370 gr (0.82 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 88 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 450 images | 270 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LP-E17 | NP-W126S |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Single UHS-II SD card slot | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $879 | $699 |