Clicky

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
69
Imaging
71
Features
85
Overall
76
Canon EOS R10 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Canon R10
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 426g - 123 x 88 x 83mm
  • Released May 2022
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the R10 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is relatively well matched but the R10 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) provide different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The R10 was revealed 5 years after the E-M1 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the R10 matches up versus the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon R10 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 R10 E-M1 II 
IntroducedMay 2022September 2016More modern by 70 months
Screen resolution1040k1037kClearer screen (+3k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Canon R10

 E-M1 II R10 

Common features in the Canon R10 and Olympus E-M1 II

 R10 E-M1 II 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Screen dimensions3.00"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon R10 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 88mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Compare the Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the R10 and the E-M1 II.

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R10 and E-M1 II is 69 and 68 respectively.

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the R10 and E-M1 II.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The R10 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Canon R10 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger R10 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon R10 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
82
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
75
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon R10
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
70
screen can move to multiple angles
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
features touch to focus
great ISO range (32,000)
no image stabilization
more heavy than others (426 grams)
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
features focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than competition (574 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon R10 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
78
silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery life (450 per charge)
supports phase detect AF
no image stabilization
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect AF
bad battery power (350 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon R10 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
76
great battery life (450 shots)
connects via bluetooth
features touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
more heavy than others (426g)
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
environment sealing
features focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
bad battery power (350 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon R10
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
79
manual focus
swap lenses (Canon RF mount)
nice screen size (3.00 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great ISO range (32,000)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (450 CIPA)
no image stabilization
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
2 card slots
bad battery power (350 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Canon R10 Vlogging information
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging information
70
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external microphone support
no image stabilization
more heavy than others (426 grams)
79
selfie friendly display
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone support
lighter than competition (574g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R10 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Canon EOS R10Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS R10 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2022-05-24 2016-09-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.2 x 14.8mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 328.6mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 32000 25600
Highest boosted ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 651 121
Lens
Lens mount type Canon RF Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 35 107
Focal length multiplier 1.6 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3.00 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.6x 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 15.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6m at ISO 100 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/200 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 4096x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MOV, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426g (0.94 lb) 574g (1.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 88 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 80
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 1312
Other
Battery life 450 pictures 350 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E17 BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Single UHS-II SD card slot Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Card slots One Two
Launch cost $879 $1,700