Clicky

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
69 Imaging
70 Features
85 Overall
76
Canon EOS R10 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Canon R10
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 426g - 123 x 88 x 83mm
  • Released May 2022
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the R10 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is relatively well matched but the R10 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) provide different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The R10 was revealed 5 years after the E-M1 II which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the R10 matches up versus the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Canon R10 over the Olympus E-M1 II

          

          

            
 R10 E-M1 II 
IntroducedMay 2022September 2016More modern by 70 months
Screen resolution1040k1037kClearer screen (+3k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Canon R10

          

          

            
 E-M1 II R10 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Canon R10 and Olympus E-M1 II

          

          

            
 R10 E-M1 II 
Focus manually  Dial exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Screen dimensions3.00"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen  Both are selfie friendly
Touch friendly screen  Quickly navigate
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Canon R10 provides exterior dimensions of 123mm x 88mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the R10 and the E-M1 II.
Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R10 and E-M1 II is 69 and 68 respectively.
Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Normally, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the R10 and E-M1 II.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The R10 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Canon R10 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger R10 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

            Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photography Glossary        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Canon R10 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
82
 manual focus
 sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 includes face detection focusing
 delivers RAW files
75
 you can focus manually
 decent sensor resolution (20MP)
 nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
 offers face detect focusing
 exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Street Comparison
Street photography with Canon R10
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
70
 screen can move to multiple angles
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 delivers RAW files
 features touch to focus
 great ISO range (32,000)
 no image stabilization
 more heavy than others (426 grams)
78
 screen articulates
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
 exports RAW formats
 features focus via touch
 environment sealing
 lighter than competition (574 grams)
 great high ISO (25,600)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
 Canon R10 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
77
 silent shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
 sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 includes tracking autofocus
 great battery life (450 per charge)
 supports phase detect AF
 no image stabilization
74
 maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
 silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
 high frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
 nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
 offers tracking focus
 environment sealing
 supports phase detect AF
 bad battery power (350 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Travel Comparison
 Canon R10 as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
75
 great battery life (450 shots)
 connects via bluetooth
 features touch to focus
 sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
 has built in flash
 screen is selfie friendly
 more heavy than others (426g)
72
 lighter than competition (574 grams)
 environment sealing
 features focus via touch
 decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
 selfie friendly display
 bad battery power (350 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Canon R10
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
79
 manual focus
 swap lenses (Canon RF mount)
 nice screen size (3.00 inches)
 sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
 sensor size is good (APS-C)
 great ISO range (32,000)
 delivers RAW files
 great battery life (450 CIPA)
 no image stabilization
76
 you can focus manually
 change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
 screen is a decent size (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 decent sensor resolution (20MP)
 nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
 doesnt have anti-alias filter
 great high ISO (25,600)
 exports RAW formats
 environment sealing
 2 card slots
 bad battery power (350 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R10 Vlogging information
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging information
70
 screen is selfie friendly
 touchscreen functionality
 includes face detection focusing
 high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
 comes with external microphone support
 no image stabilization
 more heavy than others (426 grams)
79
 selfie friendly display
 screen is touchscreen
 image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
 offers face detect focusing
 video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
 comes with microphone support
 lighter than competition (574g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
        
                
        

          

            
Canon R10 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R10 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Canon EOS R10Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Brand Name Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS R10 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2022-05-24 2016-09-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.2 x 14.8mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 328.6mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 32000 25600
Highest boosted ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images    
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Total focus points 651 121
Lens
Lens mount type Canon RF Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 35 107
Focal length multiplier 1.6 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3.00 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.6x 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 15.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 6m at ISO 100 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Highest flash synchronize 1/200 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 4096x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MOV, H.264
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB Yes USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 426g (0.94 lb) 574g (1.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 88 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 3.3") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 80
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 1312
Other
Battery life 450 pictures 350 pictures
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E17 BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature    
Storage type Single UHS-II SD card slot Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Card slots One Two
Launch cost $879 $1,700