Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200
52 Imaging
77 Features
93 Overall
83
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Increase to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 6000 x 3164 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 1015g - 150 x 143 x 87mm
- Launched September 2021
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T100
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Canon R3 versus Fujifilm X-T200, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the R3 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) is pretty similar but the R3 (Full frame) and Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe R3 was announced 21 months after the Fujifilm X-T200 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the R3 grades vs the Fujifilm X-T200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS R3 and Fujifilm X-T200. The whole galleries are available at Canon R3 Gallery and Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R3 over the Fujifilm X-T200
R3 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2021 | January 2020 | More modern by 21 months | |
Screen resolution | 4150k | 2780k | Crisper screen (+1370k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Canon R3
Fujifilm X-T200 | R3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon R3 and Fujifilm X-T200
R3 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Canon R3 comes with physical dimensions of 150mm x 143mm x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") and a weight of 1015 grams (2.24 lbs) and the Fujifilm X-T200 has specifications of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check the Canon R3 versus Fujifilm X-T200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the R3 vs the Fujifilm X-T200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the R3 and Fujifilm X-T200 is 52 and 80 respectively.
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the R3 and Fujifilm X-T200.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The R3 includes the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The more recent R3 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R3 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Specifications
Canon EOS R3 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS R3 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2021-09-14 | 2020-01-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | Stacked CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 204800 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 50 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 1053 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Number of lenses | 27 | 54 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.2 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 4,150 thousand dot | 2,780 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/64000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 6000x3164 (60p/50p/30p/24p/23.98p) 4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) 3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) 1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 6000x3164 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1015 gr (2.24 pounds) | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 143 x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 96 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 25.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4086 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 760 images | 270 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E19 | NP-W126S |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC (UHS-II supported) + CFexpress Type B | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch pricing | $6,000 | $699 |