Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
52 Imaging
77 Features
93 Overall
83
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 6000 x 3164 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 1015g - 150 x 143 x 87mm
- Announced September 2021
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Canon R3 versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Canon and Hasselblad. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the R3 (24MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the R3 (Full frame) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) use different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe R3 was released 2 years later than the X1D II 50C and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon R3 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the R3 scores against the X1D II 50C in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS R3 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon R3 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
R3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2021 | June 2019 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 4150k | 2360k | Sharper screen (+1790k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Canon R3
X1D II 50C | R3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
Common features in the Canon R3 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
R3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon R3 enjoys outer measurements of 150mm x 143mm x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") along with a weight of 1015 grams (2.24 lbs) while the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Analyze the Canon R3 versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the R3 and the X1D II 50C.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the R3 and X1D II 50C is 52 and 60 respectively.
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the R3 and X1D II 50C.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The R3 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide more detail as a result of its extra 27MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher R3 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Canon EOS R3 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model | Canon EOS R3 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2021-09-14 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | Stacked CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 51MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon RF | Hasselblad X |
Number of lenses | 27 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.2" | 3.60" |
Display resolution | 4,150k dots | 2,360k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 3,690k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/64000 seconds | 1/10000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | 2.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 6000x3164 (60p/50p/30p/24p/23.98p) 4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) 3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) 1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 6000x3164 | 2720x1530 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1015 gr (2.24 lb) | 725 gr (1.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 143 x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 96 | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | 25.0 | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.7 | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | 4086 | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 760 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E19 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC (UHS-II supported) + CFexpress Type B | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | 2 | 2 |
Pricing at launch | $6,000 | $5,750 |