Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5
Portability
52 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
52 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
Portability
80 Imaging
63 Features
88 Overall
73
80 Imaging
63 Features
88 Overall
73
Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Key Specs
Canon R3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 6000 x 3164 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 1015g - 150 x 143 x 87mm
- Released September 2021
OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2022
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the R3 (24MP) and the OM System OM-5 (20MP) is fairly similar but the R3 (Full frame) and OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe R3 was manufactured 13 months prior to the OM System OM-5 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the R3 grades against the OM System OM-5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS R3 & OM System OM-5. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon R3 Gallery & OM System OM-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R3 over the OM System OM-5
| R3 | OM System OM-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.2" |  | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 4150k |  | 1040k | Clearer display (+3110k dot) |
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Canon R3
| OM System OM-5 | R3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2022 |  | September 2021 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Canon R3 and OM System OM-5
| R3 | OM System OM-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
| Selfie screen |  | Both are selfie friendly | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Canon R3 features physical measurements of 150mm x 143mm x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") with a weight of 1015 grams (2.24 lbs) and the OM System OM-5 has specifications of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the R3 versus the OM System OM-5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the R3 and OM System OM-5 is 52 and 80 respectively.
Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the R3 and OM System OM-5.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The R3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Canon R3 will offer extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older R3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon R3 as a Portrait photography camera
OM System OM-5 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
provides face detect focus
supports RAW files
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Canon R3 as a Street photography camera
OM System OM-5 as a Street photography camera
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
large sensor size (Full frame)
supports RAW files
boasts focus via touch
environment sealing
good ISO range (102,400)
more heavy than competition in class (1,015g)
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features touch to focus
environment sealing
great ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Canon R3 as a Sports photography camera
OM System OM-5 as a Sports photography camera
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/64,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
great battery pack (760 shots)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Canon R3 as a Travel photography camera
OM System OM-5 as a Travel photography camera
great battery pack (760 CIPA)
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
more heavy than competition in class (1,015g)
environment sealing
supports bluetooth
features touch to focus
MP count good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (310 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Canon R3 Landscape photography details
OM System OM-5 Landscape photography details
has manual focus
switch lenses (Canon RF mount)
screen is a good size (3.2 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
good ISO range (102,400)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
great battery pack (760 CIPA)
has dual storage slots
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3.00 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment sealing
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Canon R3 Vlogging features
OM System OM-5 Vlogging features
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (6000 x 3164 pixels)
includes microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (1,015 grams)
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon R3 vs OM System OM-5 Specifications
| Canon EOS R3 | OM System OM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon EOS R3 | OM System OM-5 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2021-09-14 | 2022-10-26 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | Stacked CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 204800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 1053 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Canon RF | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 27 | 119 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3.2 inches | 3.00 inches |
| Resolution of display | 4,150k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/64000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 6000x3164 (60p/50p/30p/24p/23.98p) 4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) 3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) 1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 6000x3164 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1015 gr (2.24 lb) | 414 gr (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 143 x 87mm (5.9" x 5.6" x 3.4") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 96 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 25.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4086 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 760 shots | 310 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LP-E19 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC (UHS-II supported) + CFexpress Type B | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Pricing at release | $6,000 | $1,200 |